Joni Lämsä

722 citations
33 papers · 418 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Joni Lämsä

29 papers receiving 401 citations

Peers

Joni Lämsä
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Computer Science Applications 86
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 147
  • Education 217
  • Information Systems 111
  • Human-Computer Interaction 18
Replace Meilun Shih with:
Meilun Shih Taiwan
Nilüfer Atman Uslu Türkiye
Tonia A. Dousay United States
Chee Kit Looi Singapore
Mai Neo Malaysia
Pei‐Ying Chen Taiwan
Lisa Gjedde Denmark
Johanna Pöysä‐Tarhonen Finland
Çiğdem Hürsen Cyprus
Taotao Long China
Joni Lämsä relative to Meilun Shih Taiwan Meilun Shih's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.2×
Meilun Shih · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Joni Lämsä

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joni Lämsä's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joni Lämsä with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joni Lämsä more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joni Lämsä

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joni Lämsä. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joni Lämsä. The network helps show where Joni Lämsä may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Joni Lämsä, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Joni Lämsä Line = papers co-authored together Joni Lämsä links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020110
2 202151
3 201849
4 201831
5 201931
6 202119
7
PISA 18 ensituloksia: Suomi parhaiden joukossa
201915
8 202215
9 201814
10 202311
11 20169
12 20248
13 20237
14 20226
15 20256
16 20185
17 20225
18 20244
19 20244
20 20233

About Joni Lämsä

Joni Lämsä is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education, Computer Science Applications, Social Psychology and Information Systems, having authored 33 papers that have together received 418 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (18 papers), Online and Blended Learning (7 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (7 papers), Education and Technology Integration (3 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (3 papers), Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (3 papers), Gender and Technology in Education (3 papers) and Research in Social Sciences (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (86 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (147 citations), Education (217 citations), Information Systems (111 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (18 citations). Joni Lämsä has collaborated with scholars based in Finland, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Raija Hämäläinen, Pekka Koskinen, Jouni Viiri, Kari Nissinen, Mikko Aro, Andy Nguyen, Sanna Järvelä, Daniela Caballero, Ahmed Tlili and Abelino Jiménez. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Learning Analytics, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Frontline Learning Research, British Journal of Educational Technology and Computers in Human Behavior.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact