John Pill

679 citations
25 papers · 445 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

John Pill

23 papers receiving 395 citations

Peers

John Pill
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Language and Linguistics 183
  • Literature and Literary Theory 162
  • Research and Theory 7
  • Linguistics and Language 35
  • Education 176
Replace Susan Bosher with:
Susan Bosher United States
Susy Macqueen Australia
Kathrin Kaufhold Sweden
Pamela Pearson United States
Jonathan Webster United Kingdom
Ismaeil Fazel Canada
Eunice Torres United States
Jessica Singer Early United States
Abbas Ali Zarei Iran
Guy R. Todnem
John Pill relative to Susan Bosher United States Susan Bosher's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Susan Bosher · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Pill

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Pill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Pill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Pill more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Pill

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Pill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Pill. The network helps show where John Pill may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside John Pill, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Pill Line = papers co-authored together John Pill links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013125
2 201363
3 201253
4 201740
5 201532
6
Transitioning from university to the workplace:Stakeholder perceptions of academic and professional writing demands.
201628
7 201418
8 201515
9 201511
10 20118
11 20157
12 20127
13 20135
14 20225
15
Towards improved healthcare communication: Development and validation of language proficiency standards for non-native English speaking health professionals
20135
16 20204
17 20224
18 20213
19 20243
20
Investigating the test impact of the OET: A qualitative study of stakeholder perceptions of test relevance and efficacy
20133

About John Pill

John Pill is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Language and Linguistics, Education, Literature and Literary Theory and Emergency Medical Services, having authored 25 papers that have together received 445 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare (10 papers), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (6 papers), Higher Education Learning Practices (6 papers), Second Language Learning and Teaching (5 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (4 papers), EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (4 papers), Student Assessment and Feedback (4 papers) and Education Systems and Policy (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Language and Linguistics (183 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (162 citations), Research and Theory (7 citations), Linguistics and Language (35 citations) and Education (176 citations). John Pill has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Lebanon. Frequent co-authors include Luke Harding, Tim McNamara, Robyn Woodward‐Kron, Elizabeth Manias, Catherine Elder, Gillian Webb, Geoff McColl, Ute Knoch, Susy Macqueen and Hyejeong Kim. Their work appears in journals such as Language Testing, Language Assessment Quarterly, TESOL Quarterly, Journal of Advanced Nursing and Language & Communication.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact