John Pill

668 citations
21 papers · 319 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

John Pill

21 papers receiving 300 citations

Peers

John Pill
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Language and Linguistics 121
  • Research and Theory 9
  • Literature and Literary Theory 103
  • Education 129
  • Linguistics and Language 19
Replace Susan Bosher with:
Susan Bosher United States
Kathrin Kaufhold Sweden
Ismaeil Fazel Canada
Pamela Pearson United States
Marie Manidis Australia
Linda L. Olson United States
Glenn Martínez United States
Abbas Ali Zarei Iran
Jessica Singer Early United States
André Vågan Norway
John Pill relative to Susan Bosher United States Susan Bosher's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.6×
Susan Bosher · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Pill

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Pill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Pill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Pill more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Pill

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Pill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Pill. The network helps show where John Pill may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside John Pill, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Pill Line = papers co-authored together John Pill links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013107
2 201360
3 201732
4 201523
5 201221
6 201413
7 201511
8 201511
9 20127
10 20156
11 20135
12 20224
13 20223
14 20123
15 20242
16 20212
17 20112
18
Investigating the test impact of the OET: A qualitative study of stakeholder perceptions of test relevance and efficacy
20132
19
A most engaging scholar:Tim McNamara and the role of language testing expertise
20192
20
Towards improved healthcare communication: Development and validation of language proficiency standards for non-native English speaking health professionals
20132

About John Pill

John Pill is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Language and Linguistics, Education, Literature and Literary Theory and Emergency Medical Services, having authored 21 papers that have together received 319 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare (10 papers), Higher Education Learning Practices (6 papers), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (6 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (4 papers), Second Language Learning and Teaching (4 papers), Education Systems and Policy (3 papers), EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (3 papers) and Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Language and Linguistics (121 citations), Research and Theory (9 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (103 citations), Education (129 citations) and Linguistics and Language (19 citations). John Pill has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Lebanon. Frequent co-authors include Luke Harding, Tim McNamara, Robyn Woodward‐Kron, Catherine Elder, Gillian Webb, Elizabeth Manias, Geoff McColl, Hyejeong Kim, Takanori Sato and Ying Zhang. Their work appears in journals such as Language Testing, Language Assessment Quarterly, TESOL Quarterly, Health Communication and Journal of Advanced Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact