John C. Earls

15 papers receiving 799 citations

Peers

John C. Earls
Comparison fields: 5 of 127
  • Biological Psychiatry 23
  • Computational Mathematics 5
  • Physiology 205
  • Aging 13
  • Molecular Biology 476
Replace Herman van Wietmarschen with:
Herman van Wietmarschen Netherlands
Kati Kristiansson Finland
Sara Ahadi United States
Nicole Phillips United States
Laura Moody United States
Kristin Brogaard United States
Rory Wilson Germany
Carolina Salvador Mexico
Qing Cao China
John C. Earls relative to Herman van Wietmarschen Netherlands Herman van Wietmarschen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Herman van Wietmarschen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John C. Earls

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John C. Earls's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John C. Earls with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John C. Earls more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John C. Earls

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John C. Earls. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John C. Earls. The network helps show where John C. Earls may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John C. Earls, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John C. Earls Line = papers co-authored together John C. Earls links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2017267
2 2019217
3 202371
4 201358
5 201949
6 202044
7 201737
8 202021
9 201418
10 202012
11 20118
12 20134
13
Planificación agrícola andina : bases para un manejo cibernético de sistemas de andenes
19893
14
La agricultura andina ante una globalización en desplome
20063
15 20151

About John C. Earls

John C. Earls is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Physiology, Genetics, Cancer Research and General Health Professions, having authored 15 papers that have together received 813 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (7 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (4 papers), Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (2 papers), Gene expression and cancer classification (2 papers), Gut microbiota and health (2 papers), Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics (1 paper), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (1 paper) and Phagocytosis and Immune Regulation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (23 citations), Computational Mathematics (5 citations), Physiology (205 citations), Aging (13 citations) and Molecular Biology (476 citations). John C. Earls has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Nathan D. Price, Leroy Hood, Andrew T. Magis, Jennifer C. Lovejoy, Gilbert S. Omenn, Tomasz Wilmanski, Noa Rappaport, Sean M. Gibbons, Ohad Manor and Roie Levy. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Nature Biotechnology, The Journals of Gerontology Series A, Nature Medicine and Journal of Clinical Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact