Jeffrey Moriarty

38 papers receiving 621 citations

Peers

Jeffrey Moriarty
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Information Systems and Management 148
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 131
  • Strategy and Management 163
  • Political Science and International Relations 142
  • Philosophy 65
Replace Charles J. Hartmann with:
Charles J. Hartmann United States
Roger Brown United Kingdom
Sébastien Point France
Ignacio Ferrero Spain
Jason A. Snyder United States
J. Norman Baldwin United States
Laura Saunders United States
Oliver Hahl United States
Charles A. Rarick United States
Armin Beverungen United Kingdom
Jeffrey Moriarty relative to Charles J. Hartmann United States Charles J. Hartmann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13.6×
Charles J. Hartmann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jeffrey Moriarty

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jeffrey Moriarty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jeffrey Moriarty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jeffrey Moriarty more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jeffrey Moriarty

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jeffrey Moriarty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jeffrey Moriarty. The network helps show where Jeffrey Moriarty may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Jeffrey Moriarty, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jeffrey Moriarty Line = papers co-authored together Jeffrey Moriarty links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201094
2 201683
3 201254
4 200548
5 200947
6 200443
7 200538
8 200338
9 200927
10 200427
11 200924
12
Normative Theory and Business Ethics
200821
13 201919
14 202115
15 200314
16 201112
17 20089
18 20148
19 20028
20 20157

About Jeffrey Moriarty

Jeffrey Moriarty is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Cognitive Neuroscience, Economics and Econometrics, Information Systems and Management and Philosophy, having authored 39 papers that have together received 694 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political Philosophy and Ethics (12 papers), Ethics in Business and Education (7 papers), Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (6 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (5 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (4 papers), Free Will and Agency (4 papers), Corporate Law and Human Rights (3 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Information Systems and Management (148 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (131 citations), Strategy and Management (163 citations), Political Science and International Relations (142 citations) and Philosophy (65 citations). Jeffrey Moriarty has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Waheed Hussain, Joseph Heath, Wayne Norman, Randy D. Weinstein, Kenneth R. Muske, G. Kane Jennings, Ramon Colorado, M. V. Patel, Geoff Moore and Norman E. Bowie. Their work appears in journals such as Business Ethics Quarterly, Journal of Business Ethics, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, Ethics and Information Technology and Pacific philosophical quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact