Ethics and Information Technology

About

The 890 papers published in Ethics and Information Technology in the last decades have received a total of 19.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Ethics and Information Technology usually cover Sociology and Political Science (345 papers), Safety Research (326 papers) and Cognitive Neuroscience (226 papers) specifically the topics of Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (320 papers), Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (151 papers) and Privacy, Security, and Data Protection (137 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Ethics and Information Technology are Luciano Floridi, Amanda Sharkey, Mark Coeckelbergh, Michael Zimmer, Andreas Matthias, Engin Bozdag, Noel Sharkey, Philip Brey, David J. Gunkel and James H. Moor.

In The Last Decade

Ethics and Information Technology

782 papers receiving 17.3k citations

Fields of papers published in Ethics and Information Technology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Ethics and Information Technology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Ethics and Information Technology.

Countries where authors publish in Ethics and Information Technology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Ethics and Information Technology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Ethics and Information Technology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ethics and Information Technology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026