Ignacio Ferrero

40 papers receiving 684 citations

Peers

Ignacio Ferrero
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Information Systems and Management 264
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 248
  • Demography 132
  • Strategy and Management 125
  • Health Informatics 10
Replace Jana Craft with:
Jana Craft United States
Ningyu Tang China
Can M. Alpaslan United States
Manuel Guillén Spain
Anke Arnaud United States
Kanika T. Bhal India
Koustab Ghosh India
Karin Lasthuizen New Zealand
Yvette P. Lopez United States
Peixu He China
Ignacio Ferrero relative to Jana Craft United States Jana Craft's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Jana Craft · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ignacio Ferrero

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ignacio Ferrero's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ignacio Ferrero with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ignacio Ferrero more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ignacio Ferrero

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ignacio Ferrero. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ignacio Ferrero. The network helps show where Ignacio Ferrero may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Ignacio Ferrero, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ignacio Ferrero Line = papers co-authored together Ignacio Ferrero links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014133
2 201496
3 201578
4 201664
5 201742
6 201639
7 201432
8 201930
9 202029
10 201725
11 202417
12 201817
13 202016
14 201315
15 201810
16 201710
17 20128
18 20247
19 20187
20 20146

About Ignacio Ferrero

Ignacio Ferrero is a scholar working on Information Systems and Management, Sociology and Political Science, Finance, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Strategy and Management, having authored 44 papers that have together received 725 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in Business and Education (19 papers), Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (6 papers), Workplace Spirituality and Leadership (6 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (4 papers), Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting (3 papers), Weber, Simmel, Sociological Theory (3 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (3 papers) and Ethics in medical practice (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Information Systems and Management (264 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (248 citations), Demography (132 citations), Strategy and Management (125 citations) and Health Informatics (10 citations). Ignacio Ferrero has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, Ireland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Alejo José G. Sisón, W. Michael Hoffman, Manuel Guillén, Ricardo Leiva, Gregory R. Beabout, Ron Beadle, Massimiliano Matteo Pellegrini, Marcel Meyer, Emilio Domínguez-Escrig and Rodolfo Gómez Ponce de León. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Business Ethics, Business Ethics A European Review, Business Ethics Quarterly, British Journal of Management and Business and Professional Ethics Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact