Ignacio Ferrero

35 papers receiving 644 citations

Peers

Ignacio Ferrero
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Information Systems and Management 333
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 145
  • Strategy and Management 112
  • Demography 70
  • Philosophy 89
Replace Can M. Alpaslan with:
Can M. Alpaslan United States
Jeffrey Moriarty United States
Alan E. Singer New Zealand
Betsy Stevens United States
Mahendra Joshi United States
Lynn Sharp Paine United States
Daniel R. Gilbert United States
Bette Ann Stead United States
William G. Scott United States
Reinhard Bachmann United Kingdom
Ignacio Ferrero relative to Can M. Alpaslan United States Can M. Alpaslan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.4×
Can M. Alpaslan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ignacio Ferrero

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ignacio Ferrero's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ignacio Ferrero with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ignacio Ferrero more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ignacio Ferrero

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ignacio Ferrero. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ignacio Ferrero. The network helps show where Ignacio Ferrero may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Ignacio Ferrero, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ignacio Ferrero Line = papers co-authored together Ignacio Ferrero links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014135
2 201495
3 201578
4 201664
5 201638
6 201431
7 201929
8 202029
9 201726
10 202420
11 201819
12 202016
13 201315
14 201711
15 201810
16 20128
17 20187
18 20247
19 20216
20 20184

About Ignacio Ferrero

Ignacio Ferrero is a scholar working on Information Systems and Management, Philosophy, Safety Research, Strategy and Management and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, having authored 42 papers that have together received 680 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in Business and Education (30 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (8 papers), Society, Economy, and Ethics Research (5 papers), Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (4 papers), Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting (3 papers), Historical Economic and Legal Thought (2 papers), Reformed Theology and Governance (2 papers) and Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Information Systems and Management (333 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (145 citations), Strategy and Management (112 citations), Demography (70 citations) and Philosophy (89 citations). Ignacio Ferrero has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, Ireland and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Alejo José G. Sisón, W. Michael Hoffman, Manuel Guillén, Massimiliano Matteo Pellegrini, Ron Beadle, Marcel Meyer, Dirk C. Moosmayer, J. Ruiz-Alba, Juncal Cuñado and Vidya Sagar Athota. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Business Ethics, Business Ethics A European Review, Business Ethics Quarterly, Business Ethics the Environment & Responsibility and Business and Professional Ethics Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact