J. Scott Smith

2.8k citations
79 papers · 2.3k · h-index 26

Impact in

Papers in

J. Scott Smith

79 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

J. Scott Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 125
  • Animal Science and Zoology 540
  • Biochemistry 294
  • Food Science 772
  • Clinical Biochemistry 167
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 272
Replace Byong-Tae Jeon with:
Byong-Tae Jeon South Korea
Mariza Pires de Melo Brazil
Yvonne C. O’Callaghan Ireland
Trine Kastrup Dalsgaard Denmark
Ingegerd Sjöholm Sweden
Samy H. Ashoor United States
Leonard M. Libbey United States
Georgios Koutsidis United Kingdom
Ralf G. Berger Germany
Teruyoshi Matoba Japan
J. Scott Smith relative to Byong-Tae Jeon South Korea Byong-Tae Jeon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Byong-Tae Jeon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. Scott Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Scott Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Scott Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Scott Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Scott Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Scott Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Scott Smith. The network helps show where J. Scott Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside J. Scott Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. Scott Smith Line = papers co-authored together J. Scott Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 79 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014161
2 2014147
3 2011127
4
Irradiation and food safety
2004120
5 2002113
6
Food Processing: Principles and Applications
200596
7 201173
8 200670
9 197570
10 200868
11 200665
12 199265
13 201064
14 198163
15 201056
16 200645
17 200043
18 199440
19 202339
20 200239

About J. Scott Smith

J. Scott Smith is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Food Science, Molecular Biology, Plant Science and Clinical Biochemistry, having authored 79 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Meat and Animal Product Quality (28 papers), Radiation Effects and Dosimetry (14 papers), Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food (8 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (8 papers), Advanced Glycation End Products research (7 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (7 papers), Odor and Emission Control Technologies (6 papers) and Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Animal Science and Zoology (540 citations), Biochemistry (294 citations), Food Science (772 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (167 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (272 citations). J. Scott Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Thailand and Iran. Frequent co-authors include Priyadarshini Gadgil, Gengjun Chen, Suresh D. Pillai, T. A. Houser, Farshad Ameri, Rohan Thakur, Melvin C. Hunt, John F. Leslie, L. Keith Miller and I.J. Jeon. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Food Science, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Journal of Animal Science, Meat Science and Food Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact