Clinical Biochemistry

355.0k papers and 9.5M indexed citations i.

About

355.0k papers covering Clinical Biochemistry have received a total of 9.5M indexed citations since 1950. Papers on subfields are most often about the specific topic of Metabolism and Genetic Disorders, Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing and Advanced Glycation End Products research and also cover the fields of Molecular Biology, Physiology and Biochemistry. Papers citing papers on subfields are usually about Molecular Biology, Physiology and Epidemiology. Some of the most active scholars covering Clinical Biochemistry are Marjorie B. Lees, Jordi Folch, G H S Stanley, Douglas C. Wallace, Michael Brownlee, Paul J. Thornalley, Earl R. Stadtman, David C. Chan, John Baynes and Ann Marie Schmidt.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers citing papers about Clinical Biochemistry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers covering Clinical Biochemistry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers covering Clinical Biochemistry.

Countries where authors publish papers about Clinical Biochemistry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research in Clinical Biochemistry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers about Clinical Biochemistry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinical Biochemistry more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore fields with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025