J. Peeck

719 citations
21 papers · 580 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

J. Peeck

21 papers receiving 480 citations

Peers

J. Peeck
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 275
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 270
  • Education 214
  • Speech and Hearing 32
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 90
Replace Kathryn Alesandrini with:
Kathryn Alesandrini United States
Patricia Baggett United States
Malcolm L. Fleming United States
Philippe C. Duchastel United States
Charles D. Holley United States
Neil H. Schwartz United States
Daniel Lawless Canada
Floyd B. Ausburn United States
K. Denise Muth United States
Ulrich Glowalla Germany
J. Peeck relative to Kathryn Alesandrini United States Kathryn Alesandrini's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Kathryn Alesandrini · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. Peeck

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Peeck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Peeck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Peeck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Peeck

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Peeck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Peeck. The network helps show where J. Peeck may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside J. Peeck, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. Peeck Line = papers co-authored together J. Peeck links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1993168
2 197486
3 198757
4 198250
5 197046
6 198526
7 199425
8
Effects of imagery instruction on reading and retaining a literary text.
198418
9 197818
10 197915
11 197914
12 197413
13 19839
14 19828
15 19777
16 19896
17 19875
18 19784
19 19783
20 19791

About J. Peeck

J. Peeck is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education, Social Psychology and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 21 papers that have together received 580 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (10 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (4 papers), Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (3 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (2 papers), Handwritten Text Recognition Techniques (2 papers), Educational and Psychological Assessments (2 papers), Science Education and Pedagogy (2 papers) and Online and Blended Learning (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (275 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (270 citations), Education (214 citations), Speech and Hearing (32 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (90 citations). J. Peeck has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Harm Tillema and Jan de Jong. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Educational Psychology, The Journal of General Psychology, British Journal of Educational Psychology, Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition and Contemporary Educational Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact