Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition

376.6k citations
6.3k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

Papers in

Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition

5.4k papers receiving 319.1k citations

Peers

Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition
Comparison fields: 5 of 234
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 244.7k
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 146.0k
  • General Decision Sciences 20.0k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 109.1k
  • Social Psychology 57.1k
Replace Journal of Experimental Psychology General with:
Journal of Experimental Psychology General United States
Cognition United States
Memory & Cognition United States
Trends in Cognitive Sciences United States
The American Journal of Psychology United States
Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance United States
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review United States
Behavioral and Brain Sciences United States
Psychological Science United States
Frontiers in Psychology China
Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition relative to Journal of Experimental Psychology General United States Journal of Experimental Psychology General's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Journal of Experimental Psychology General · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition.

About Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition

The 6.3k papers published in Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition in the last decades have received a total of 376.6k indexed citations . Papers published in Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition usually cover General Decision Sciences (366 papers), Cognitive Neuroscience (3.4k papers), Developmental and Educational Psychology (2.3k papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.7k papers) and Artificial Intelligence (1.4k papers) specifically the topics of Memory Processes and Influences (1.6k papers), Reading and Literacy Development (950 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (941 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (913 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (902 papers), Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (498 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (393 papers) and Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (366 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition are Daniel L. Schacter, Robert M. Nosofsky, Larry L. Jacoby, Larry R. Squire, Henry L. Roediger, Peter Graf, Andrew P. Yonelinas, Moshe Naveh‐Benjamin, Mark A. McDaniel and Klaus Oberauer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact