Emma E. Wolters

30 papers receiving 558 citations

Peers

Emma E. Wolters
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 240
  • Physiology 239
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 103
  • Biological Psychiatry 12
  • Neurology 41
Replace Emma M. Coomans with:
Emma M. Coomans Netherlands
Helen Beaumont United States
Amelia Strom United States
Mahnaz Shekari Spain
Aida Niñerola‐Baizán Spain
Tessa Timmers Netherlands
Alex Whittington United Kingdom
Kaitlin N. Swinnerton United States
Daisuke Yanase Japan
Andrea Izagirre Spain
Emma E. Wolters relative to Emma M. Coomans Netherlands Emma M. Coomans's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Emma M. Coomans · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emma E. Wolters

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma E. Wolters's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma E. Wolters with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma E. Wolters more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma E. Wolters

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma E. Wolters. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma E. Wolters. The network helps show where Emma E. Wolters may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma E. Wolters, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emma E. Wolters Line = papers co-authored together Emma E. Wolters links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202169
2 201935
3 202234
4 202033
5 201933
6 202032
7 202130
8 201630
9 201229
10 201922
11 202121
12 201821
13 201820
14 202219
15 199218
16 202017
17 201314
18 202114
19 202014
20 202214

About Emma E. Wolters

Emma E. Wolters is a scholar working on Physiology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cognitive Neuroscience and Materials Chemistry, having authored 32 papers that have together received 567 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (12 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (11 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (10 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (6 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Lanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes (4 papers), Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications (3 papers) and Epilepsy research and treatment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (240 citations), Physiology (239 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (103 citations), Biological Psychiatry (12 citations) and Neurology (41 citations). Emma E. Wolters has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Sweden and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Rik Ossenkoppele, Bart N.M. van Berckel, Philip Scheltens, Sandeep S.V. Golla, Tessa Timmers, Sander C.J. Verfaillie, Ronald Boellaard, Albert D. Windhorst, Wiesje M. van der Flier and Hayel Tuncel. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Alzheimer s Research & Therapy, Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism, Molecular Imaging and Biology and EJNMMI Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact