Daniel R. Gilbert

33 papers receiving 728 citations

Peers

Daniel R. Gilbert
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Information Systems and Management 398
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 404
  • Strategy and Management 384
  • Marketing 114
  • Business and International Management 16
Replace Brian K. Burton with:
Brian K. Burton United States
Eugene Szwajkowski United States
Matthew A. Rutherford United States
John Hasnas United States
Charles J. Hartmann United States
John Simmons United Kingdom
Nathan T. Washburn United States
Linda M. Sama United States
Andrew V. Abela United States
Jan Kees Looise Netherlands
Daniel R. Gilbert relative to Brian K. Burton United States Brian K. Burton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Brian K. Burton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel R. Gilbert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel R. Gilbert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel R. Gilbert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel R. Gilbert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel R. Gilbert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel R. Gilbert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel R. Gilbert. The network helps show where Daniel R. Gilbert may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Daniel R. Gilbert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel R. Gilbert Line = papers co-authored together Daniel R. Gilbert links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1994361
2
Corporate Strategy and the Search for Ethics
1988291
3 198854
4 199537
5 201621
6 198615
7 199311
8 199410
9 199110
10 19968
11 19878
12 19978
13 20157
14
Management - 6/E.
20027
15 20016
16 19955
17 20035
18
MANAJEMEN JILID II : EDISI BAHASA INDONESIA
19965
19 20234
20
A Logic for strategy
19884

About Daniel R. Gilbert

Daniel R. Gilbert is a scholar working on Information Systems and Management, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science, Law and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 37 papers that have together received 907 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in Business and Education (11 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (9 papers), Management Theory and Practice (5 papers), Legal Studies and Policies (2 papers), Lymphatic Disorders and Treatments (1 paper), Legal and Social Justice Studies (1 paper), Management and Marketing Education (1 paper) and Renal cell carcinoma treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Information Systems and Management (398 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (404 citations), Strategy and Management (384 citations), Marketing (114 citations) and Business and International Management (16 citations). Daniel R. Gilbert has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include R. Edward Freeman, Andrew C. Wicks, Edwin Hartman, Ronney Abaza, Jordan Angell, James E. Post, Ruth Freeman, Carol D. Jacobson, James A. F. Stoner and Bidhan L. Parmar. Their work appears in journals such as Business Ethics Quarterly, Journal of Business Ethics, Business & Society, Urology and Organizational Behavior Teaching Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact