Andrew Metha

3.0k citations
83 papers · 2.2k · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

Andrew Metha

76 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

Andrew Metha
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 1.2k
  • Ophthalmology 428
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 487
  • Biophysics 99
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 335
Replace Lawrence C. Sincich with:
Lawrence C. Sincich United States
Orin Packer United States
John Robson United States
Andrew C. James Australia
R. F. Hess Canada
Alyssa A. Brewer United States
Kenneth R. Alexander United States
Heidi Hofer United States
Daniel G. Green United States
Janine D. Mendola United States
Andrew Metha relative to Lawrence C. Sincich United States Lawrence C. Sincich's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Lawrence C. Sincich · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Metha

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Metha's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Metha with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Metha more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Metha

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Metha. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Metha. The network helps show where Andrew Metha may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Andrew Metha, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Andrew Metha Line = papers co-authored together Andrew Metha links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 83 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999378
2 2001196
3 2000178
4 2001116
5 200588
6 201283
7 200879
8 200362
9 199454
10 199952
11 199349
12 198945
13 201644
14 200339
15 199839
16 199639
17 200735
18 201235
19 201335
20 201733

About Andrew Metha

Andrew Metha is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Ophthalmology, Epidemiology and Molecular Biology, having authored 83 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (28 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (18 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (15 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (12 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (12 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (11 papers), Optical Coherence Tomography Applications (8 papers) and Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (1.2k citations), Ophthalmology (428 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (487 citations), Biophysics (99 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (335 citations). Andrew Metha has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Phillip Bedggood, Peter Lennie, John Krauskopf, David R. Williams, Austin Roorda, Algis J. Vingrys, Chris Tailby, Kathy T. Mullen, Layne L. Wright and Mike B. Calford. Their work appears in journals such as Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Biomedical Optics Express, Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Clinical and Experimental Optometry and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact