Maureen Neitz

171 papers receiving 5.9k citations

Peers

Maureen Neitz
Comparison fields: 5 of 146
  • Ophthalmology 1.0k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 2.1k
  • Sensory Systems 515
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 1.2k
  • Molecular Biology 3.0k
Replace Jay Neitz with:
Jay Neitz United States
Lindsay T. Sharpe Germany
J. D. Mollon United Kingdom
Andrew Stockman United Kingdom
Vivianne C. Smith United States
Paul R. Martin Australia
Jonathan T. Erichsen United Kingdom
Leo M. Chalupa United States
Peter Gouras United States
Donald E. Mitchell Canada
Maureen Neitz relative to Jay Neitz United States Jay Neitz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Jay Neitz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Maureen Neitz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Maureen Neitz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Maureen Neitz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Maureen Neitz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Maureen Neitz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Maureen Neitz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Maureen Neitz. The network helps show where Maureen Neitz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Maureen Neitz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Maureen Neitz Line = papers co-authored together Maureen Neitz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 175 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1991365
2 2005294
3 2009232
4 2010220
5 1996207
6 2002190
7 2004187
8 2000164
9 1996162
10 1993145
11 2015130
12 2011129
13 1996123
14 2000113
15 2002112
16 2022105
17 199598
18
Estimates of L : M cone ratio from ERG flicker photometry and genetics
200293
19 199886
20 200784

About Maureen Neitz

Maureen Neitz is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Ophthalmology and Cell Biology, having authored 175 papers that have together received 6.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Development and Disorders (98 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (61 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (25 papers), melanin and skin pigmentation (21 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (18 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (14 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (13 papers) and Color Science and Applications (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (1.0k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (2.1k citations), Sensory Systems (515 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.2k citations) and Molecular Biology (3.0k citations). Maureen Neitz has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Jay Neitz, Gerald H. Jacobs, Joseph Carroll, David R. Williams, Heidi Hofer, James A. Kuchenbecker, Jess F. Deegan, Yasuki Yamauchi, Stephanie A. Hagstrom and Katherine Mancuso. Their work appears in journals such as Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Vision Research, Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Visual Neuroscience and Journal of Vision.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact