Nathan Doble

1.7k citations
60 papers · 1.1k · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Nathan Doble

55 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Nathan Doble
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Ophthalmology 502
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 334
  • Epidemiology 355
  • Biophysics 64
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 136
Replace Hope M Queener with:
Hope M Queener United States
Qiang Yang United States
Ramkumar Sabesan United States
Fernando Romero‐Borja United States
Ethan A. Rossi United States
Jason Porter United States
Yusufu N. Sulai United States
Pavan Tiruveedhula United States
Silvestre Manzanera Spain
George Smith Australia
Nathan Doble relative to Hope M Queener United States Hope M Queener's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Hope M Queener · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nathan Doble

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan Doble's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan Doble with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan Doble more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan Doble

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan Doble. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan Doble. The network helps show where Nathan Doble may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nathan Doble, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nathan Doble Line = papers co-authored together Nathan Doble links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 60 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005148
2 2006145
3 2016105
4 2010104
5 200296
6 200758
7 200455
8 200944
9 201038
10 200738
11 201826
12 200518
13 201817
14 201516
15 201815
16 201115
17 200514
18 200614
19 200913
20 200612

About Nathan Doble

Nathan Doble is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Epidemiology, Biomedical Engineering and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 60 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (24 papers), Optical Coherence Tomography Applications (19 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (13 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (11 papers), Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (11 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (10 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (8 papers) and Optical Systems and Laser Technology (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (502 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (334 citations), Epidemiology (355 citations), Biophysics (64 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (136 citations). Nathan Doble has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include David R. Williams, Stacey S. Choi, John S. Werner, Elaine M. Wells-Gray, John L. Keltner, S. S. Choi, Joseph L. Hardy, Joseph Carroll, Nicole Putnam and Heidi Hofer. Their work appears in journals such as Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Optics Letters, Biomedical Optics Express, Journal of Vision and Journal of the Optical Society of America A.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact