Ian Cox

55 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Ian Cox's Hit Papers

Monochromatic aberrations of the human eye in a large population 2001 · 558 citations
5580+8+16Years since publication100200300400500

Peers

Ian Cox
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Ophthalmology 549
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 1.1k
  • Epidemiology 1.1k
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 202
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 146
Replace Xu Cheng with:
Xu Cheng United States
Jason D. Marsack United States
Toshifumi Mihashi Japan
Norberto López‐Gil Spain
Sergio Barbero Spain
Henk A Weeber Netherlands
Antonio Benito Spain
Juan Tabernero Spain
Antonio Guirao Spain
Patricia Piers Netherlands
Ian Cox relative to Xu Cheng United States Xu Cheng's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Xu Cheng · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ian Cox

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ian Cox's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ian Cox with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ian Cox more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ian Cox

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ian Cox. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ian Cox. The network helps show where Ian Cox may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ian Cox, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ian Cox Line = papers co-authored together Ian Cox links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 60 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Monochromatic aberrations of the human eye in a large population
Hit paper breakdown →
2001558
2 2001232
3 2000145
4 2005145
5 2002113
6 2003108
7 200491
8 200780
9 200659
10 200548
11 198937
12 199036
13 200435
14 200234
15 200729
16 199029
17 200528
18 200926
19 200922
20 201420

About Ian Cox

Ian Cox is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Epidemiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Ophthalmology and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 60 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Corneal surgery and disorders (30 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (26 papers), Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (13 papers), Optical measurement and interference techniques (4 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (4 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (4 papers), Optical Coherence Tomography Applications (4 papers) and Retinal Diseases and Treatments (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (549 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (1.1k citations), Epidemiology (1.1k citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (202 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (146 citations). Ian Cox has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and France. Frequent co-authors include David R. Williams, Antonio Guirao, Jason Porter, Geunyoung Yoon, Scott MacRae, Jianhua Wang, Joseph Thomas, Heidi Hofer, Andrew M. Rollins and Tae Moon Jeong. Their work appears in journals such as Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Optometry and Vision Science, Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, Journal of the Optical Society of America A and Journal of Refractive Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact