Guy Prihar
Impact in
- Physiology top 5%
- Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Neurology top 10%
- Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Papers in
-
- Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks 2
- Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes 2
- RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms 1
- Nuclear Structure and Function 1
-
- Alzheimer's disease research and treatments 5
- Co-authors
- Richard Crook (7 shared papers)John Hardy (8 shared papers)Henry Houlden (4 shared papers)Matt Baker (2 shared papers)Karen Duff (2 shared papers)Andrew Grover (2 shared papers)Stuart Pickering‐Brown (1 shared paper)Jada Lewis (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Neuroreport (3 papers)Neurobiology of Aging (1 paper)Annals of Neurology (1 paper)Journal of Biological Chemistry (1 paper)Human Molecular Genetics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomBelgium
In The Last Decade
Guy Prihar
8 papers receiving 744 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Physiology 586
- Neurology 84
- Neurology 138
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 161
- Pharmacology 139
Countries citing papers authored by Guy Prihar
This map shows the geographic impact of Guy Prihar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Guy Prihar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Guy Prihar more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Guy Prihar
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Guy Prihar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Guy Prihar. The network helps show where Guy Prihar may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Guy Prihar, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1999 | 241 | |
| 2 | 1997 | 168 | |
| 3 | 1996 | 155 | |
| 4 | 1998 | 56 | |
| 5 | 1994 | 48 | |
| 6 | 1996 | 44 | |
| 7 | 1996 | 34 | |
| 8 | 1999 | 9 | |
| 9 | 2000 | 0 |
About Guy Prihar
Guy Prihar is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Physiology, Pharmacology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Neurology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 755 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (5 papers), Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (2 papers), Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks (2 papers), Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes (2 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (1 paper), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (1 paper), Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (1 paper) and Nuclear Structure and Function (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Physiology (586 citations), Neurology (84 citations), Neurology (138 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (161 citations) and Pharmacology (139 citations). Guy Prihar has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Richard Crook, John Hardy, Henry Houlden, Matt Baker, Karen Duff, Andrew Grover, Stuart Pickering‐Brown, Jada Lewis, Mike Hutton and Jennifer Adamson. Their work appears in journals such as Neuroreport, Neurobiology of Aging, Annals of Neurology, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Human Molecular Genetics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.