Neurobiology of Aging

8.9k papers and 395.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 8.9k papers published in Neurobiology of Aging in the last decades have received a total of 395.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Neurobiology of Aging usually cover Physiology (3.5k papers), Molecular Biology (2.2k papers) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (2.0k papers) specifically the topics of Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (2.9k papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (1.2k papers) and Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (1.2k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Neurobiology of Aging are Heiko Braak, Eva Braak, Mark J. West, George Bartzokis, Kelly Del Tredici, Udo Rüb, Rob A. I. de Vos, Ernst N.H. Jansen Steur, Timothy A. Salthouse and Carl W. Cotman.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Neurobiology of Aging

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Neurobiology of Aging. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Neurobiology of Aging.

Countries where authors publish in Neurobiology of Aging

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Neurobiology of Aging. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Neurobiology of Aging with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neurobiology of Aging more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025