Pharmacology
Impact in
- Biological Psychiatry 515.0k
- Molecular Medicine 969.8k
Also classified as
- Molecular Medicine 40.5k
- Toxicology 26.1k
Pharmacology
208.2k papers receiving 2.1M citations
Countries where authors publish papers about Pharmacology
This map shows the geographic impact of research in Pharmacology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers about Pharmacology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pharmacology more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers about Pharmacology
This network shows the impact of papers covering Pharmacology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers covering Pharmacology.
About Pharmacology
1.3M papers covering Pharmacology have received a total of 31.1M indexed citations since 1950 . Papers on Pharmacology are most often about the specific topic of Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation, Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy, Fungal Biology and Applications, Inflammatory mediators and NSAID effects, Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis, Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research, Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases and Treatment of Major Depression and also cover the fields of Molecular Medicine, Toxicology, Pharmacology, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology and Complementary and alternative medicine. Papers citing work on Pharmacology are usually about Biological Psychiatry, Molecular Medicine, Toxicology, Pharmacology and Psychiatry and Mental health. Some of the most active scholars covering Pharmacology are Marshal F. Folstein, Paul R. McHugh, Susan E. Folstein, John R. Vane, Ronald Melzack, Dennis J. Selkoe, Vincenzo Di Marzo, Kurt Kroenke, Andreas Stang and David Newman.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.