Ginny Smith

14 papers receiving 251 citations

Peers

Ginny Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 143
  • Computer Science Applications 54
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 47
  • Human-Computer Interaction 9
  • Social Psychology 33
Replace Daryn A. Dever with:
Daryn A. Dever United States
Shashank Pawar United States
Megan Wiedbusch United States
Felicitas Biwer Netherlands
Maria Woolverton United States
Amber Chauncey Strain United States
Franz Wortha Germany
Attila Pásztor Hungary
Alfred Valdez United States
Maria Wirzberger Germany
Ginny Smith relative to Daryn A. Dever United States Daryn A. Dever's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Daryn A. Dever · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ginny Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ginny Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ginny Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ginny Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ginny Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ginny Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ginny Smith. The network helps show where Ginny Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Ginny Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ginny Smith Line = papers co-authored together Ginny Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 202073
2 200449
3 202134
4 202022
5 202121
6 202018
7 202117
8 202215
9 20228
10 19865
11
Designing and Validating a Stealth Assessment for Calculus Competencies.
20193
12 20212
13 20082
14 20221

About Ginny Smith

Ginny Smith is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Computer Science Applications and Education, having authored 14 papers that have together received 270 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Educational Games and Gamification (9 papers), Digital Games and Media (3 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (3 papers), Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (2 papers), Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning (2 papers), Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (2 papers), Teaching and Learning Programming (2 papers) and Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (143 citations), Computer Science Applications (54 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (47 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (9 citations) and Social Psychology (33 citations). Ginny Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Valerie J. Shute, Seyedahmad Rahimi, Chih‐Pu Dai, E. Ashby Plant, Kristen C. Kling, Zhichun Liu, Russell G. Almond, Cristina Alonso‐Fernández, Fengfeng Ke and Chen Sun. Their work appears in journals such as Educational Technology Research and Development, Computers & Education, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, Sex Roles and Journal of Computer Assisted Learning.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact