Electronic Commerce Research

23.4k citations
1.1k papers · · active since 2016

Impact in

    • Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Marketing top 2%
    • Consumer Retail Behavior Studies
    • Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
    • Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing

Papers in

    • Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing 185
    • Consumer Retail Behavior Studies 119
    • Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification 93
    • Technology Adoption and User Behaviour 196

Electronic Commerce Research

999 papers receiving 22.1k citations

Peers

Electronic Commerce Research
Comparison fields: 5 of 195
  • Information Systems and Management 6.1k
  • Marketing 6.9k
  • Business and International Management 1.0k
  • Management Information Systems 3.4k
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 2.2k
Replace Journal of theoretical and applied electronic commerce research with:
Journal of theoretical and applied electronic commerce research China
Journal of Global Information Management China
Journal of Consumer Affairs United States
Information Technology and People United States
Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ) Australia
Qualitative Market Research An International Journal United Kingdom
Management Research Review United States
Business & Information Systems Engineering Germany
International Journal of Mobile Communications United States
International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education United States
Electronic Commerce Research relative to Journal of theoretical and applied electronic commerce research China Journal of theoretical and applied electronic commerce research's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Journal of theoretical and applied electronic commerce research · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Electronic Commerce Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Electronic Commerce Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Electronic Commerce Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Electronic Commerce Research more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Electronic Commerce Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Electronic Commerce Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Electronic Commerce Research.

About Electronic Commerce Research

The 1.1k papers published in Electronic Commerce Research in the last decades have received a total of 23.4k indexed citations . Papers published in Electronic Commerce Research usually cover Marketing (398 papers), Information Systems and Management (198 papers), Business and International Management (43 papers), Management Information Systems (185 papers) and Strategy and Management (179 papers) specifically the topics of Digital Marketing and Social Media (336 papers), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (196 papers), Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (185 papers), Digital Platforms and Economics (121 papers), Consumer Retail Behavior Studies (119 papers), Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (93 papers), Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (83 papers) and Supply Chain and Inventory Management (74 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Electronic Commerce Research are Jin Baek Kim, Zhong Hui Yang, Xue Ding, Ismail Sila, Tseng‐Lung Huang, Shuling Liao, Marios D. Sotiriadis, Ciná Van Zyl, Wanglin Ma and Satish Kumar.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact