Francesco Berto
Impact in
-
- Philosophy and History of Science
- Philosophy top 0.5%
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Classical Philosophy and Thought
Papers in
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science 32
-
- Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge 28
- Co-authors
- Mark Jago (2 shared papers)Aybüke Özgün (4 shared papers)Graham Priest (3 shared papers)David Ripley (1 shared paper)Greg Restall (1 shared paper)Rohan French (1 shared paper)Koji Tanaka (1 shared paper)Francesco Paoli (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Synthese (5 papers)Philosophical Studies (4 papers)Journal of Philosophical Logic (4 papers)Erkenntnis (3 papers)The Review of Symbolic Logic (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited KingdomFrance
In The Last Decade
Francesco Berto
57 papers receiving 750 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- History and Philosophy of Science 164
- Philosophy 349
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 373
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 227
- Artificial Intelligence 407
Countries citing papers authored by Francesco Berto
This map shows the geographic impact of Francesco Berto's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Francesco Berto with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Francesco Berto more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Francesco Berto
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Francesco Berto. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Francesco Berto. The network helps show where Francesco Berto may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 12 scholars most cited alongside Francesco Berto, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 60 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 62 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 61 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 45 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 34 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 33 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 32 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 32 | |
| 8 | Impossible Worlds | 2019 | 32 |
| 9 | 2022 | 31 | |
| 10 | 2012 | 31 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 28 | |
| 12 | 2012 | 26 | |
| 13 | 2019 | 25 | |
| 14 | 2018 | 25 | |
| 15 | 2009 | 25 | |
| 16 | 2009 | 24 | |
| 17 | 2012 | 20 | |
| 18 | How to Sell a Contradiction: The Logic and Metaphysics of Inconsistency | 2007 | 18 |
| 19 | 2008 | 16 | |
| 20 | 2020 | 14 |
About Francesco Berto
Francesco Berto is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, Philosophy, Computational Theory and Mathematics and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 60 papers that have together received 805 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (32 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (28 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (16 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (9 papers), Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (8 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (8 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (6 papers) and Quantum Mechanics and Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (164 citations), Philosophy (349 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (373 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (227 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (407 citations). Francesco Berto has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include Mark Jago, Aybüke Özgün, Graham Priest, David Ripley, Greg Restall, Rohan French, Koji Tanaka, Francesco Paoli, Edwin Mares and Jacopo Tagliabue. Their work appears in journals such as Synthese, Philosophical Studies, Journal of Philosophical Logic, Erkenntnis and The Review of Symbolic Logic.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.