Greg Restall

88 papers receiving 2k citations

Peers

Greg Restall
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 982
  • Artificial Intelligence 1.5k
  • Philosophy 618
  • Theoretical Computer Science 67
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 478
Replace Jc Beall with:
Jc Beall United States
Neil W. Tennant United States
Stephen Read United Kingdom
David Ripley United States
Richard Routley Australia
Jon Michael Dunn United States
Timothy Smiley United Kingdom
Dag Prawitz Sweden
Lloyd Humberstone Australia
Vann McGee United States
Greg Restall relative to Jc Beall United States Jc Beall's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Jc Beall · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Greg Restall

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Greg Restall's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Greg Restall with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Greg Restall more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Greg Restall

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Greg Restall. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Greg Restall. The network helps show where Greg Restall may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Greg Restall, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Greg Restall Line = papers co-authored together Greg Restall links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 96 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002308
2 1969167
3 2002136
4
Multiple conclusions
2005118
5 1996113
6 200083
7 199981
8 201169
9 200565
10 200962
11 200555
12 199349
13 200249
14 199745
15 201245
16 199242
17 200642
18 199838
19 201138
20 200736

About Greg Restall

Greg Restall is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Artificial Intelligence, Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Theoretical Computer Science, having authored 96 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (63 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (40 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (20 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (14 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (6 papers), Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (5 papers), History and Theory of Mathematics (3 papers) and Philosophy, Science, and History (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Theory and Mathematics (982 citations), Artificial Intelligence (1.5k citations), Philosophy (618 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (67 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (478 citations). Greg Restall has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jc Beall, Jon Michael Dunn, Daniel Nolan, Caroline West, John Slaney, Francesco Berto, Graham Priest, Ross T. Brady, Allen Hazen and Toby Handfield. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Philosophical Logic, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, Studia Logica, Australasian Journal of Philosophy and The Review of Symbolic Logic.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact