Daniel Nolan
Impact in
- Philosophy top 0.2%
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Papers in
- Philosophy 53
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 42
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory 9
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science 41
- Co-authors
- Caroline West (2 shared papers)Greg Restall (1 shared paper)Carrie Jenkins (1 shared paper)Carrie Jenkins (3 shared papers)John O'Leary‐Hawthorne (1 shared paper)Rachael Briggs (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Philosophical Studies (7 papers)Noûs (5 papers)Inquiry (4 papers)Analysis (3 papers)Philosophy Compass (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Daniel Nolan
71 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Philosophy 868
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 672
- History and Philosophy of Science 230
- Theoretical Computer Science 27
- Language and Linguistics 143
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Nolan
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Nolan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Nolan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Nolan more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Nolan
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Nolan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Nolan. The network helps show where Daniel Nolan may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Nolan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 79 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1997 | 295 | |
| 2 | 1999 | 202 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 114 | |
| 4 | 1997 | 89 | |
| 5 | 2005 | 65 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 44 | |
| 7 | 2003 | 42 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 34 | |
| 9 | 2005 | 33 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 32 | |
| 11 | 1996 | 30 | |
| 12 | 2006 | 30 | |
| 13 | 2001 | 25 | |
| 14 | 2011 | 25 | |
| 15 | 1996 | 20 | |
| 16 | 1999 | 20 | |
| 17 | 1997 | 19 | |
| 18 | 2014 | 19 | |
| 19 | 2007 | 17 | |
| 20 | 2008 | 17 |
About Daniel Nolan
Daniel Nolan is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science, Language and Linguistics and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 79 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (42 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (41 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (12 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (9 papers), Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (8 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (7 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (7 papers) and Narrative Theory and Analysis (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (868 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (672 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (230 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (27 citations) and Language and Linguistics (143 citations). Daniel Nolan has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Caroline West, Greg Restall, Carrie Jenkins, Carrie Jenkins, John O'Leary‐Hawthorne and Rachael Briggs. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophical Studies, Noûs, Inquiry, Analysis and Philosophy Compass.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.