Vann McGee

3.1k citations
43 papers · 1.3k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Vann McGee

38 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Vann McGee
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • History and Philosophy of Science 330
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 739
  • Philosophy 514
  • Theoretical Computer Science 31
  • General Decision Sciences 38
Replace Hannes Leitgeb with:
Hannes Leitgeb Germany
David Ripley Australia
Francesco Berto Netherlands
Daniel Nolan Australia
Richmond H. Thomason United States
Jc Beall United States
Lloyd Humberstone Australia
C. J. F. Williams United Kingdom
Greg Restall Australia
Øystein Linnebo Norway
Vann McGee relative to Hannes Leitgeb Germany Hannes Leitgeb's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Hannes Leitgeb · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Vann McGee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Vann McGee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Vann McGee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Vann McGee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Vann McGee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Vann McGee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Vann McGee. The network helps show where Vann McGee may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Vann McGee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Vann McGee Line = papers co-authored together Vann McGee links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1991180
2 1985178
3 1995111
4 1989107
5 199785
6
Truth, Vagueness, and Paradox: An Essay on the Logic of Truth
199160
7 199259
8 198553
9
Learning the impossible
199446
10 199645
11 199340
12 199333
13 200030
14 199430
15 199223
16 200419
17 200517
18 200016
19 198914
20 199914

About Vann McGee

Vann McGee is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Philosophy, having authored 43 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (7 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (7 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (5 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (4 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (3 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (3 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (2 papers) and Classical Philosophy and Thought (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (330 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (739 citations), Philosophy (514 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (31 citations) and General Decision Sciences (38 citations). Vann McGee has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Brian P. McLaughlin, Jon Barwise, John Etchemendy, Jamie Tappenden, George Boolos, David H. Sanford, Agustín Rayo, Anil K. Gupta, Richard T. Oehrle and Nuel Belnap. Their work appears in journals such as Analysis, Journal of Symbolic Logic, Journal of Philosophical Logic, The Philosophical Review and Philosophical Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact