Vann McGee

48 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Vann McGee
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • History and Philosophy of Science 467
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.1k
  • Philosophy 753
  • Theoretical Computer Science 37
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 432
Replace Hannes Leitgeb with:
Hannes Leitgeb Germany
Lloyd Humberstone Australia
Hugues Leblanc United States
Greg Restall Australia
David Ripley United States
Neil Tennant United States
Jc Beall United States
Daniel Nolan Australia
J. H. Woodger Mexico
Stephen Read United Kingdom
Vann McGee relative to Hannes Leitgeb Germany Hannes Leitgeb's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Hannes Leitgeb · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Vann McGee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Vann McGee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Vann McGee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Vann McGee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Vann McGee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Vann McGee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Vann McGee. The network helps show where Vann McGee may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Vann McGee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Vann McGee Line = papers co-authored together Vann McGee links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1991248
2 1985238
3 1995154
4 1989139
5 1997119
6 199276
7
Truth, Vagueness, and Paradox: An Essay on the Logic of Truth
199167
8 198564
9
Learning the impossible
199455
10 199651
11 201848
12 199345
13 199343
14 199435
15 200034
16 200033
17 200432
18 198925
19 199225
20 200524

About Vann McGee

Vann McGee is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, History and Philosophy of Science, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Philosophy, having authored 55 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (12 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (8 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (7 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (5 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (4 papers), History and Theory of Mathematics (4 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (3 papers) and Logic, programming, and type systems (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (467 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.1k citations), Philosophy (753 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (37 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (432 citations). Vann McGee has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Brian P. McLaughlin, Jon Barwise, John Etchemendy, Jamie Tappenden, George Boolos, David H. Sanford, Agustín Rayo, Keith Lehrer, Anil K. Gupta and Nuel Belnap. Their work appears in journals such as Analysis, Journal of Symbolic Logic, The Philosophical Review, Journal of Philosophical Logic and Philosophical Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact