Vann McGee

46 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Vann McGee
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Theoretical Computer Science 118
  • Philosophy 818
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 506
  • Artificial Intelligence 840
  • History and Philosophy of Science 214
Replace Hannes Leitgeb with:
Hannes Leitgeb Germany
Greg Restall Australia
John Etchemendy United States
Neil W. Tennant United States
Hugues Leblanc United States
George Boolos United States
Jon Michael Dunn United States
Dag Prawitz Sweden
J. H. Woodger United Kingdom
Stephen Read United Kingdom
Vann McGee relative to Hannes Leitgeb Germany Hannes Leitgeb's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Hannes Leitgeb · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Vann McGee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Vann McGee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Vann McGee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Vann McGee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Vann McGee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Vann McGee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Vann McGee. The network helps show where Vann McGee may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Vann McGee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Vann McGee Line = papers co-authored together Vann McGee links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1991233
2 1985224
3 1995149
4 1989128
5 1997116
6 199271
7
Truth, Vagueness, and Paradox: An Essay on the Logic of Truth
199164
8 198563
9
Learning the impossible
199453
10 199651
11 201847
12 199344
13 199341
14 199435
15 200033
16 200032
17 200430
18 200027
19 198925
20 199225

About Vann McGee

Vann McGee is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, History and Philosophy of Science and Geometry and Topology, having authored 51 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (30 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (24 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (19 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (9 papers), Advanced Topology and Set Theory (8 papers), Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (7 papers), History and Theory of Mathematics (5 papers) and Advanced Algebra and Logic (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Theoretical Computer Science (118 citations), Philosophy (818 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (506 citations), Artificial Intelligence (840 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (214 citations). Vann McGee has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Brian P. McLaughlin, John Etchemendy, Jon Barwise, Jamie Tappenden, Agustín Rayo, George Boolos, David H. Sanford, Keith Lehrer, Anil Kumar Gupta and Nuel Belnap. Their work appears in journals such as Analysis, The Philosophical Review, Philosophical Studies, Journal of Philosophical Logic and The Journal of Philosophy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact