Cian Dorr
Impact in
- History and Philosophy of Science top 0.5%
- Philosophy and History of Science
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Papers in
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science 27
- Philosophy 20
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 16
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory 4
- Classical Philosophy and Thought 4
- Co-authors
- John Hawthorne (5 shared papers)Jeremy Goodman (2 shared papers)Juhani Yli‐Vakkuri (2 shared papers)Jacob M. Nebel (2 shared papers)Frank Arntzenius (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Philosophical Perspectives (4 papers)Noûs (3 papers)Mind (2 papers)Analysis (2 papers)The Philosophical Review (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
Cian Dorr
34 papers receiving 623 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- History and Philosophy of Science 265
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 572
- Philosophy 486
- Cognitive Neuroscience 132
- Theoretical Computer Science 8
Countries citing papers authored by Cian Dorr
This map shows the geographic impact of Cian Dorr's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cian Dorr with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cian Dorr more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Cian Dorr
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cian Dorr. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cian Dorr. The network helps show where Cian Dorr may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Cian Dorr, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 | 128 | |
| 2 | 2003 | 56 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 53 | |
| 4 | 2002 | 47 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 42 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 40 | |
| 7 | There are no abstract objects | 2005 | 40 |
| 8 | 2016 | 38 | |
| 9 | 2004 | 35 | |
| 10 | The Simplicity of Everything | 2002 | 33 |
| 11 | 2002 | 30 | |
| 12 | 2014 | 25 | |
| 13 | 2010 | 18 | |
| 14 | 2022 | 17 | |
| 15 | 2021 | 16 | |
| 16 | 2017 | 15 | |
| 17 | 2003 | 15 | |
| 18 | 2019 | 14 | |
| 19 | 2010 | 12 | |
| 20 | 2010 | 11 |
About Cian Dorr
Cian Dorr is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science, Artificial Intelligence and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 35 papers that have together received 761 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (27 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (16 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (8 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (6 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (4 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (4 papers), Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (3 papers) and Free Will and Agency (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (265 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (572 citations), Philosophy (486 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (132 citations) and Theoretical Computer Science (8 citations). Cian Dorr has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include John Hawthorne, Jeremy Goodman, Juhani Yli‐Vakkuri, Jacob M. Nebel and Frank Arntzenius. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophical Perspectives, Noûs, Mind, Analysis and The Philosophical Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.