Edwin Mares

1.7k citations
67 papers · 1.0k · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Edwin Mares

62 papers receiving 910 citations

Peers

Edwin Mares
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 483
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 343
  • History and Philosophy of Science 127
  • Artificial Intelligence 754
  • Philosophy 229
Replace Gabriel Sandu with:
Gabriel Sandu Finland
Timothy Smiley United Kingdom
Roy T. Cook United States
Godehard Link Germany
Jc Beall United States
Rosanna Keefe United Kingdom
Wolfgang Lenzen Germany
Joke Meheus Belgium
Gila Sher United States
Frank Veltman Netherlands
Edwin Mares relative to Gabriel Sandu Finland Gabriel Sandu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.4×
Gabriel Sandu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Edwin Mares

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edwin Mares's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edwin Mares with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edwin Mares more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edwin Mares

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edwin Mares. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edwin Mares. The network helps show where Edwin Mares may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Edwin Mares, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Edwin Mares Line = papers co-authored together Edwin Mares links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 67 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004137
2
Relevant Logic: A Philosophical Interpretation
2004119
3 201168
4 200463
5 201361
6 199758
7 199642
8 201242
9 200636
10 199534
11 200829
12 200426
13 200225
14 201022
15 199219
16 199318
17 200915
18 200014
19 199213
20 200713

About Edwin Mares

Edwin Mares is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 67 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (39 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (26 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (17 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (15 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (11 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (7 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (6 papers) and Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Theory and Mathematics (483 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (343 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (127 citations), Artificial Intelligence (754 citations) and Philosophy (229 citations). Edwin Mares has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Francesco Paoli, Robert Y. Cavana, Robert Goldblatt, Robert K. Meyer, Andr� Fuhrmann, Koji Tanaka, Francesco Berto, Greg Restall, Stuart Brock and Ross T. Brady. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Philosophical Logic, Studia Logica, Synthese, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic and The Review of Symbolic Logic.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact