Mark Jago
Impact in
- Philosophy top 0.5%
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Papers in
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science 42
-
- Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge 38
- Semantic Web and Ontologies 11
- Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation 11
- Co-authors
- Francesco Berto (7 shared papers)Stephen Barker (2 shared papers)Pierre du Preez (7 shared papers)Greg Stuart‐Hill (3 shared papers)Robin Naidoo (3 shared papers)Natasha Alechina (9 shared papers)Brian Logan (9 shared papers)E. C. Anderson (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Synthese (9 papers)Analysis (7 papers)Mind (5 papers)Journal of Environmental Management (3 papers)Journal of Wildlife Diseases (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomNamibiaAustralia
In The Last Decade
Mark Jago
93 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 134
- Philosophy 456
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 480
- History and Philosophy of Science 183
- Small Animals 148
- Artificial Intelligence 481
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Jago
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Jago's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Jago with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Jago more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Jago
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Jago. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Jago. The network helps show where Mark Jago may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Jago, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 102 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2005 | 109 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 82 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 79 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 66 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 58 | |
| 6 | 1990 | 57 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 54 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 51 | |
| 9 | 2006 | 47 | |
| 10 | 1990 | 43 | |
| 11 | 2012 | 40 | |
| 12 | Impossible Worlds | 2019 | 38 |
| 13 | 2018 | 33 | |
| 14 | 2008 | 31 | |
| 15 | 2007 | 27 | |
| 16 | 2019 | 26 | |
| 17 | 2010 | 25 | |
| 18 | 2008 | 25 | |
| 19 | 2014 | 23 | |
| 20 | 2013 | 22 |
About Mark Jago
Mark Jago is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science and Agronomy and Crop Science, having authored 102 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (42 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (38 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (27 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (15 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (11 papers), Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation (11 papers), Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (9 papers) and Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (456 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (480 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (183 citations), Small Animals (148 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (481 citations). Mark Jago has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Namibia and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Francesco Berto, Stephen Barker, Pierre du Preez, Greg Stuart‐Hill, Robin Naidoo, Natasha Alechina, Brian Logan, E. C. Anderson, Martin Wegmann and Michael B. Worley. Their work appears in journals such as Synthese, Analysis, Mind, Journal of Environmental Management and Journal of Wildlife Diseases.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.