Danielle D. King

26 papers receiving 805 citations

Peers

Danielle D. King
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 357
  • Social Psychology 185
  • Gender Studies 95
  • Applied Psychology 34
  • Public Administration 41
Replace Beth Ann Livingston with:
Beth Ann Livingston United States
Gelaye Debebe United States
Elad Netanel Sherf United States
Juliana Barreiros Porto Brazil
Kim James United Kingdom
Todd Woodruff United States
Veselina P. Vracheva United States
Tiffany Keller Hansbrough United States
Michelle M. Harrison United States
Michelle M. Hammond United States
Danielle D. King relative to Beth Ann Livingston United States Beth Ann Livingston's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.4×
Beth Ann Livingston · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Danielle D. King

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Danielle D. King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Danielle D. King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Danielle D. King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Danielle D. King

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Danielle D. King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Danielle D. King. The network helps show where Danielle D. King may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Danielle D. King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Danielle D. King Line = papers co-authored together Danielle D. King links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015250
2 201781
3 201964
4 201964
5 202160
6 201745
7 202240
8 202031
9 202231
10 201730
11 201627
12 201522
13 202022
14 202220
15 201613
16 20197
17 20216
18 20236
19 20246
20 20215

About Danielle D. King

Danielle D. King is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Clinical Psychology, Gender Studies, Social Psychology and Applied Psychology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 845 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Resilience and Mental Health (9 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (9 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (5 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (4 papers), Racial and Ethnic Identity Research (4 papers), Team Dynamics and Performance (3 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (2 papers) and Critical Race Theory in Education (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (357 citations), Social Psychology (185 citations), Gender Studies (95 citations), Applied Psychology (34 citations) and Public Administration (41 citations). Danielle D. King has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Alexander Newman, Fred Luthans, Ann Marie Ryan, Kyle M. Brykman, Linn Van Dyne, Russell Eric Johnson, Abdifatah A. Ali, Szu‐Han Lin, Courtney Lynn McCluney and Brent A. Scott. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, Equality Diversity and Inclusion An International Journal, Journal of Business and Psychology, Industrial and Organizational Psychology and Journal of Vocational Behavior.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact