Kim James

1.3k citations
53 papers · 910 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Kim James

47 papers receiving 769 citations

Peers

Kim James
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 383
  • Public Administration 61
  • Applied Psychology 71
  • Gender Studies 107
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 65
Replace Barry R. Nathan with:
Barry R. Nathan United States
Kenwyn K. Smith United States
Melissa L. Gruys United States
Jon Aarum Andersen Sweden
Wilfred H. Drath United States
Frank Shipper United States
Michael B. Harari United States
Tom D. Taber United States
Kenneth P. Carson United States
Glen Rogers United States
Kim James relative to Barry R. Nathan United States Barry R. Nathan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.2×
Barry R. Nathan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kim James

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kim James's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kim James with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kim James more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kim James

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kim James. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kim James. The network helps show where Kim James may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kim James, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kim James Line = papers co-authored together Kim James links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 53 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011134
2 200698
3 198266
4 198761
5 201159
6 200446
7 200743
8 200542
9 200531
10 201630
11 199027
12
Leadership Development: Best Practice Guide for Organisations
200121
13
Pressure at work: A survival guide
198721
14 199916
15 199415
16 201315
17 200215
18 200813
19 200912
20 198712

About Kim James

Kim James is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology, Management Science and Operations Research, Clinical Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 53 papers that have together received 910 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Management and Organizational Studies (15 papers), Organizational Learning and Leadership (9 papers), Management Theory and Practice (4 papers), Complex Systems and Decision Making (4 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (3 papers), Work-Family Balance Challenges (3 papers), Organizational Downsizing and Restructuring (2 papers) and Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (383 citations), Public Administration (61 citations), Applied Psychology (71 citations), Gender Studies (107 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (65 citations). Kim James has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Hong Kong and United States. Frequent co-authors include David Denyer, Susan Vinnicombe, Val Singh, John Burgoyne, Donna Ladkin, Ruth Belling, Robin Stanley Snell, Donna Burnett, Janet Wolff and Catherine Bailey. Their work appears in journals such as Management Learning, Leonardo, Journal of Management Development, Journal of Managerial Psychology and Leadership.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact