Daniela Borda
Impact in
- Biotechnology top 2%
- Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety
- Microbial Inactivation Methods
- Food Science top 2%
- Food Safety and Hygiene
- Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity
- Microencapsulation and Drying Processes
- Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology
- Proteins in Food Systems
Papers in
- Food Science 35
- Food Safety and Hygiene 14
- Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity 9
- Microencapsulation and Drying Processes 8
- Food Supply Chain Traceability 5
-
- Microbial Inactivation Methods 14
- Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety 10
- Co-authors
- Anca Ioana Nicolau (20 shared papers)Loredana Dumitraşcu (13 shared papers)Leontina Grigore‐Gurgu (12 shared papers)Octavian Augustin Mihalache (7 shared papers)Solveig Langsrud (8 shared papers)Nicoleta Stănciuc (6 shared papers)Iuliana Aprodu (5 shared papers)Paula Teixeira (8 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Daniela Borda
59 papers receiving 871 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
- Biotechnology 250
- Food Science 486
- Biochemistry 58
- Animal Science and Zoology 80
- Drug Discovery 1
Countries citing papers authored by Daniela Borda
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniela Borda's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniela Borda with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniela Borda more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniela Borda
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniela Borda. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniela Borda. The network helps show where Daniela Borda may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniela Borda, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 60 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2021 | 67 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 46 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 44 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 40 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 37 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 36 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 35 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 35 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 33 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 33 | |
| 11 | 2016 | 32 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 30 | |
| 13 | 2019 | 29 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 25 | |
| 15 | 2021 | 24 | |
| 16 | 2004 | 23 | |
| 17 | 2020 | 23 | |
| 18 | 2019 | 23 | |
| 19 | 2014 | 21 | |
| 20 | 2022 | 20 |
About Daniela Borda
Daniela Borda is a scholar working on Food Science, Biotechnology, Molecular Biology, Biomaterials and Plant Science, having authored 60 papers that have together received 895 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Food Safety and Hygiene (14 papers), Microbial Inactivation Methods (14 papers), Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety (10 papers), Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging (9 papers), Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (9 papers), Microencapsulation and Drying Processes (8 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (7 papers) and Food Supply Chain Traceability (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biotechnology (250 citations), Food Science (486 citations), Biochemistry (58 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (80 citations) and Drug Discovery (1 citation). Daniela Borda has collaborated with scholars based in Romania, Norway and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include Anca Ioana Nicolau, Loredana Dumitraşcu, Leontina Grigore‐Gurgu, Octavian Augustin Mihalache, Solveig Langsrud, Nicoleta Stănciuc, Iuliana Aprodu, Paula Teixeira, Elena Enachi and Trond Møretrø. Their work appears in journals such as Food Control, Foods, Applied Sciences, Molecules and BMC Genomics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.