Edwin Hartman

55 papers receiving 957 citations

Peers

Edwin Hartman
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Information Systems and Management 647
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 418
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 308
  • Philosophy 138
  • Strategy and Management 157
Replace F. Neil Brady with:
F. Neil Brady United States
George G. Brenkert United States
Gerald F. Cavanagh United States
Christopher Michaelson United States
John R. Sparks United States
Janelle Brinker Dozier United States
James B. DeConinck United States
Wim Vandekerckhove United Kingdom
Craig P. Dunn United States
Terry Morehead Dworkin United States
Edwin Hartman relative to F. Neil Brady United States F. Neil Brady's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×
F. Neil Brady · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Edwin Hartman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edwin Hartman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edwin Hartman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edwin Hartman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edwin Hartman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edwin Hartman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edwin Hartman. The network helps show where Edwin Hartman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Edwin Hartman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Edwin Hartman Line = papers co-authored together Edwin Hartman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 62 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006169
2 1996160
3 1998111
4 200788
5 201363
6 198854
7 200853
8 201252
9 201144
10 199436
11
A Logic for Strategy
198826
12 200122
13 199220
14 199619
15 197916
16 199415
17 197814
18 201512
19 201212
20 197611

About Edwin Hartman

Edwin Hartman is a scholar working on Information Systems and Management, Cognitive Neuroscience, Philosophy, Political Science and International Relations and General Health Professions, having authored 62 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in Business and Education (25 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (15 papers), Ethics in medical practice (5 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (4 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (4 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (3 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (3 papers) and Philosophical Ethics and Theory (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Information Systems and Management (647 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (418 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (308 citations), Philosophy (138 citations) and Strategy and Management (157 citations). Edwin Hartman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Alejo José G. Sisón, Daniel R. Gilbert, R. Edward Freeman, Joan Fontrodona, John J. Mauriel, Sahotra Sarkar, D. W. Hamlyn, Matthias P. Hühn, Martha C. Nussbaum and André Habisch. Their work appears in journals such as Business Ethics Quarterly, The Philosophical Review, Journal of Business Ethics, Business and Professional Ethics Journal and Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact