Concepción Cid

3.7k citations
77 papers · 3.2k · h-index 32

Impact in

Papers in

    • Coffee research and impacts 30
    • Food Chemistry and Fat Analysis 10
    • Fermentation and Sensory Analysis 7

Concepción Cid

74 papers receiving 3.0k citations

Peers

Concepción Cid
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
  • Pharmacology 1.7k
  • Biochemistry 588
  • Food Science 1.2k
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 850
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 437
Replace María-Paz De Peña with:
María-Paz De Peña Spain
Eva Guillamón Spain
Marta de Toledo Benassi Brazil
Ana Belščak‐Cvitanović Croatia
Grażyna Budryn Poland
Ewa Nebesny Poland
L. Jagan Mohan Rao India
Wenjiang Dong China
Devin G. Peterson United States
C.R. Lerici Italy
Concepción Cid relative to María-Paz De Peña Spain María-Paz De Peña's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
María-Paz De Peña · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Concepción Cid

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Concepción Cid's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Concepción Cid with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Concepción Cid more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Concepción Cid

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Concepción Cid. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Concepción Cid. The network helps show where Concepción Cid may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Concepción Cid, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Concepción Cid Line = papers co-authored together Concepción Cid links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 77 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014174
2 2012166
3 2006151
4 2001145
5 2011141
6 2012132
7 2015125
8 200191
9 200390
10 201788
11 200386
12 200185
13 201485
14 200284
15 200784
16 200782
17 201580
18 201076
19 201773
20 200266

About Concepción Cid

Concepción Cid is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Food Science, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Biochemistry and Plant Science, having authored 77 papers that have together received 3.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Coffee research and impacts (30 papers), Tea Polyphenols and Effects (22 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (19 papers), Food Chemistry and Fat Analysis (10 papers), Cynara cardunculus studies (8 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (8 papers), Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (7 papers) and Pomegranate: compositions and health benefits (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (1.7k citations), Biochemistry (588 citations), Food Science (1.2k citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (850 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (437 citations). Concepción Cid has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, United Kingdom and Italy. Frequent co-authors include María-Paz De Peña, Iziar A. Ludwig, Susana Andueza, Isabel Juániz, Jimena Bravo, Carmen Monente, José Belló, Cristina Sanz, Lothar W. Kroh and Pedro Mena. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Meat Science, Food Research International, Food Chemistry and Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact