Christopher To

20 papers receiving 398 citations

Peers

Christopher To
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 103
  • General Decision Sciences 14
  • Safety Research 57
  • Applied Psychology 29
  • Social Psychology 118
Replace Sirio Lonati with:
Sirio Lonati France
Samantha D. Hansen Canada
Anna C. Lennard United States
Stanley B. Silverman United States
Brian D. Cawley United States
Marie‐Line Germain United States
Rose Trevelyan Australia
Michael O’Driscoll New Zealand
Oana C. Fodor Romania
Marc Ortegren United States
Christopher To relative to Sirio Lonati France Sirio Lonati's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.4×
Sirio Lonati · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher To

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher To's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher To with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher To more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher To

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher To. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher To. The network helps show where Christopher To may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Christopher To, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Christopher To Line = papers co-authored together Christopher To links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201769
2 201657
3 202056
4 201944
5 202042
6 201938
7 202032
8 202319
9 202110
10 20179
11 20238
12 20207
13 20216
14 20215
15 20174
16 20173
17 20153
18
Butterworths Hong Kong arbitration law handbook : Arbitration Ordinance (Cap 609)
20121
19 20161
20 20081

About Christopher To

Christopher To is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Safety Research, Surgery and Strategy and Management, having authored 23 papers that have together received 415 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (7 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (5 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (4 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers), Environmental Impact and Sustainability (2 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (2 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (2 papers) and Dispute Resolution and Class Actions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (103 citations), General Decision Sciences (14 citations), Safety Research (57 citations), Applied Psychology (29 citations) and Social Psychology (118 citations). Christopher To has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Gavin J. Kilduff, Lisa M. Leslie, Carlos J. Torelli, Lisa D. Ordóñez, Maurice E. Schweitzer, Nathan C. Pettit, Sarah Doyle, Robert B. Lount, Jon Jachimowicz and Adam D. Galinsky. Their work appears in journals such as Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Academy of Management Journal, Academy of Management Annals, Organization Science and Current Opinion in Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact