Stephen J. Sauer

14 papers receiving 303 citations

Peers

Stephen J. Sauer
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 137
  • Gender Studies 67
  • Social Psychology 97
  • Communication 33
  • Strategy and Management 61
Replace Xiaoshuang Lin with:
Xiaoshuang Lin Australia
Brian D. Cawley United States
Kim Gower United States
Constance Campbell United States
Oana C. Fodor Romania
Robin Cheramie United States
John W. Whiteoak Australia
An-Chih Wang Taiwan
Celile Itır Göğüş Türkiye
Sara L. Wheeler-Smith United States
Stephen J. Sauer relative to Xiaoshuang Lin Australia Xiaoshuang Lin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Xiaoshuang Lin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen J. Sauer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen J. Sauer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen J. Sauer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen J. Sauer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen J. Sauer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen J. Sauer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen J. Sauer. The network helps show where Stephen J. Sauer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Stephen J. Sauer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen J. Sauer Line = papers co-authored together Stephen J. Sauer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 2014104
2 2011103
3 201034
4 200932
5 201411
6 201311
7 201411
8
The Effects of Goals and Pay Structure on Managerial Reporting Dishonesty
20185
9 20193
10 20133
11 20112
12 20241
13
Too Good to Be True? The Unintended Signaling Effects of Educational Prestige on External Expectations of Team Performance
20091
14 20121
15
Why bossy is better for rookie managers.
20120
16 20060

About Stephen J. Sauer

Stephen J. Sauer is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management and Safety Research, having authored 16 papers that have together received 322 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (4 papers), Team Dynamics and Performance (4 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (3 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (3 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (3 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (3 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (3 papers) and Workplace Spirituality and Leadership (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (137 citations), Gender Studies (67 citations), Social Psychology (97 citations), Communication (33 citations) and Strategy and Management (61 citations). Stephen J. Sauer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and France. Frequent co-authors include Kevyn Yong, Elizabeth A. Mannix, Melissa C. Thomas-Hunt, P. A. Morris, Matthew Rodgers, Chad A. Proell, Scott A. Desmond, Martin D. Heintzelman, Nathan C. Pettit and Robert B. Lount. Their work appears in journals such as Small Group Research, Psychology of Women Quarterly, Personnel Review, Accounting and Finance and Human Resource Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact