C Mccormick

5.3k citations
39 papers · 618 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

C Mccormick

37 papers receiving 506 citations

Peers

C Mccormick
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 344
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 234
  • Education 208
  • Language and Linguistics 55
  • Statistics and Probability 27
Replace Sherrie L. Nist with:
Sherrie L. Nist United States
Gary M. Schumacher United States
Jaan Mikk Estonia
Ellen N Junn United States
Colleen M. Zeitz United States
Faria Sana Canada
Eric Amsel United States
H. Broekkamp Netherlands
Jeffrey T. Steedle United States
Winston E. Rampaul
C Mccormick relative to Sherrie L. Nist United States Sherrie L. Nist's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Sherrie L. Nist · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C Mccormick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C Mccormick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C Mccormick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C Mccormick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C Mccormick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C Mccormick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C Mccormick. The network helps show where C Mccormick may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside C Mccormick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C Mccormick Line = papers co-authored together C Mccormick links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Child and Adolescent Development for Educators
200178
2 197958
3 198256
4 198044
5
Educational Psychology: Learning, Instruction, Assessment
199644
6 198237
7 198329
8 198026
9 200025
10 200723
11 198822
12 198920
13 198418
14 198718
15 197615
16 201713
17 201912
18 198112
19 20208
20 19928

About C Mccormick

C Mccormick is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education, Artificial Intelligence and Oncology, having authored 39 papers that have together received 618 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (12 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (7 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (5 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (4 papers), PARP inhibition in cancer therapy (4 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (4 papers), Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (4 papers) and Advanced Text Analysis Techniques (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (344 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (234 citations), Education (208 citations), Language and Linguistics (55 citations) and Statistics and Probability (27 citations). C Mccormick has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Michael Pressley, Joel R. Levin, Gloria E. Miller, John P. Rickards, Kellah M. Edens, Benita J. Barnes, Barbara B. Levin, Beverly J. Dretzke, Glenn D. Reeder and Margo A. Mastropieri. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Educational Psychology, American Educational Research Journal, Annals of Oncology, The Journal of Educational Research and Contemporary Educational Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact