Ben Seipel

427 citations
17 papers · 245 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Ben Seipel

16 papers receiving 233 citations

Peers

Ben Seipel
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 170
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 39
  • Education 80
  • Library and Information Sciences 4
  • Statistics and Probability 17
Replace Kyle B. Dempsey with:
Kyle B. Dempsey United States
Jay Samuels United States
Deni Basaraba United States
Crystal M. Ramsay United States
Mark W. Conley United States
Per Henning Uppstad Norway
Tomás Martínez Spain
Rebekah George Benjamin United States
Yuhtsuen Tzeng Taiwan
Ramiro Gilabert Spain
Ben Seipel relative to Kyle B. Dempsey United States Kyle B. Dempsey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.8×
Kyle B. Dempsey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ben Seipel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ben Seipel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ben Seipel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ben Seipel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ben Seipel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ben Seipel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ben Seipel. The network helps show where Ben Seipel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Ben Seipel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ben Seipel Line = papers co-authored together Ben Seipel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 202058
2 201447
3 201129
4 201222
5 201619
6 202118
7 202212
8 20188
9 20178
10 20166
11 20155
12 20195
13 20223
14 20202
15 20222
16 20241
17 20250

About Ben Seipel

Ben Seipel is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, Education, Information Systems and Management and Statistics and Probability, having authored 17 papers that have together received 245 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reading and Literacy Development (13 papers), Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (11 papers), Text Readability and Simplification (7 papers), Education and Critical Thinking Development (2 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (2 papers), Health and Lifestyle Studies (1 paper), Writing and Handwriting Education (1 paper) and Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (170 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (39 citations), Education (80 citations), Library and Information Sciences (4 citations) and Statistics and Probability (17 citations). Ben Seipel has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Cyprus. Frequent co-authors include Sarah E. Carlson, Virginia Clinton‐Lisell, Mark L. Davison, Kristen McMaster, Gregory C. Sales, Michael F. Graves, Gina Biancarosa, Bowen Liu, Paul van den Broek and Panayiota Kendeou. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of College Reading and Learning, Assessment for Effective Intervention, Reading and Writing, Journal of Learning Disabilities and Journal of Educational Measurement.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact