Anna Eckerdal

2.2k citations
77 papers · 1.8k · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

Anna Eckerdal

72 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Anna Eckerdal
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Computer Science Applications 1.4k
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 774
  • Media Technology 352
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 77
  • Software 118
Replace Carol Zander with:
Carol Zander United States
Yifat Ben‐David Kolikant Israel
Jan Erik Moström Sweden
Michael E. Caspersen Denmark
Barbara Ericson United States
Jens Bennedsen Denmark
Sue Fitzgerald United States
Michal Armoni Israel
Sue Sentance United Kingdom
Linda Mannila Sweden
Anna Eckerdal relative to Carol Zander United States Carol Zander's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Carol Zander · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Eckerdal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Eckerdal's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Eckerdal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Eckerdal more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Eckerdal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Eckerdal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Eckerdal. The network helps show where Anna Eckerdal may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Eckerdal, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Eckerdal Line = papers co-authored together Anna Eckerdal links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 77 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005149
2 2010112
3 200583
4 200582
5 200779
6 200772
7 200663
8 200862
9 200662
10 200759
11 201153
12 200953
13 201252
14 200749
15 201044
16 201443
17 201442
18 201640
19 200640
20
Novice Programming Students' Learning of Concepts and Practise
200935

About Anna Eckerdal

Anna Eckerdal is a scholar working on Computer Science Applications, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Media Technology, Education and Information Systems, having authored 77 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Teaching and Learning Programming (58 papers), Experimental Learning in Engineering (28 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (26 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (20 papers), Educational Games and Gamification (10 papers), Innovative Teaching Methods (8 papers), Online and Blended Learning (5 papers) and Open Education and E-Learning (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (1.4k citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (774 citations), Media Technology (352 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (77 citations) and Software (118 citations). Anna Eckerdal has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Michael Thuné, Robert McCartney, Carol Zander, Kate Sanders, Jan Erik Moström, Jonas Boustedt, Lynda Thomas, Mark B. Ratcliffe, Anders Berglund and Neena Thota. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Engineering Education, Computer Science Education, Studies in Higher Education, ACM Transactions on Computing Education and Molecular and Cellular Probes.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact