Abigail Durrant

2.2k citations
89 papers · 1.5k · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

Abigail Durrant

87 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Abigail Durrant
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Human-Computer Interaction 939
  • Museology 82
  • Demography 258
  • Applied Psychology 87
  • Occupational Therapy 60
Replace Christina Harrington with:
Christina Harrington United States
Siân Lindley United Kingdom
Austin L. Toombs United States
Cosmin Munteanu Canada
Jennifer A. Rode United States
Conor Linehan United Kingdom
Sheena Erete United States
Elena Pacenti United Kingdom
Jason Yip United States
Os Keyes United States
Abigail Durrant relative to Christina Harrington United States Christina Harrington's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.6×
Christina Harrington · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Abigail Durrant

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Abigail Durrant's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Abigail Durrant with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Abigail Durrant more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Abigail Durrant

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Abigail Durrant. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Abigail Durrant. The network helps show where Abigail Durrant may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Abigail Durrant, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Abigail Durrant Line = papers co-authored together Abigail Durrant links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 89 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017174
2 2015124
3 2012102
4 201468
5 201154
6 201646
7 201640
8 201740
9 201738
10 202336
11 201935
12 202032
13 202130
14 200929
15 201629
16 202027
17 200925
18 202124
19 200923
20 201522

About Abigail Durrant

Abigail Durrant is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Sociology and Political Science, Demography, Education and General Health Professions, having authored 89 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (57 papers), Technology Use by Older Adults (22 papers), Participatory Visual Research Methods (12 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (10 papers), Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development (10 papers), Design Education and Practice (7 papers), Persona Design and Applications (6 papers) and Museums and Cultural Heritage (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (939 citations), Museology (82 citations), Demography (258 citations), Applied Psychology (87 citations) and Occupational Therapy (60 citations). Abigail Durrant has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include David Kirk, Chris Elsden, John Vines, David Chatting, Caroline Claisse, Bettina Nissen, Andrew Garbett, Jayne Wallace, Peter Wright and Richard Banks. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Design Studies, Human-Computer Interaction, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies and Visual Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact