Museology
Impact in
-
- Cultural and Historical Studies
Also classified as
- Conservation 16k
- Historical Art and Architecture Studies 11.8k
Museology
15k papers receiving 60.6k citations
Countries where authors publish papers about Museology
This map shows the geographic impact of research in Museology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers about Museology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Museology more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers about Museology
This network shows the impact of papers covering Museology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers covering Museology.
About Museology
177.6k papers covering Museology have received a total of 782.7k indexed citations since 1951 . Papers on Museology are most often about the specific topic of Museums and Cultural Heritage, Fashion and Cultural Textiles, Historical Art and Culture Studies, Photographic and Visual Arts, Crafts, Textile, and Design, Libraries and Information Services, Cultural and Sociopolitical Studies and Historical Art and Architecture Studies and also cover the fields of Conservation, Visual Arts and Performing Arts, History, General Arts and Humanities and Archeology. Papers citing work on Museology are usually about Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Human-Computer Interaction, Marketing, Archeology and Conservation. Some of the most active scholars covering Museology are John H. Falk, Curtis D. Carbonell, Roland Barthes, Henry Jenkins, Lynn D. Dierking, Eilean Hooper‐Greenhill, Victor W. Turner, Lijing Wang, Phil Brodatz and Tony Bennett.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.