Jon Bird

2.4k citations
72 papers · 1.7k · h-index 26

Impact in

Papers in

Jon Bird

68 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Jon Bird
Comparison fields: 5 of 135
  • Human-Computer Interaction 727
  • Information Systems and Management 193
  • Applied Psychology 127
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 388
  • Computer Science Applications 70
Replace Jeff Sauro with:
Jeff Sauro United States
Andrés Lucero Finland
Jason Wiese United States
Barbara S. Chaparro United States
Paweł W. Woźniak Germany
James Miller Canada
Sri Kurniawan United States
Jörg Thomaschewski Germany
Kelly Caine United States
Martin Schrepp Germany
Jon Bird relative to Jeff Sauro United States Jeff Sauro's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Jeff Sauro · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jon Bird

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jon Bird's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jon Bird with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jon Bird more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jon Bird

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jon Bird. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jon Bird. The network helps show where Jon Bird may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jon Bird, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jon Bird Line = papers co-authored together Jon Bird links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 72 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015131
2 2010103
3
Effects of a difference in fundamental frequency in separating two sentences.
199799
4 201569
5 201660
6 201260
7 201160
8 201457
9 201556
10 201954
11 201353
12 201752
13 201443
14 201442
15 201441
16 201539
17 201738
18 198338
19 201137
20 201536

About Jon Bird

Jon Bird is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Cognitive Neuroscience, Information Systems and Management, General Health Professions and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 72 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (22 papers), Interactive and Immersive Displays (13 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (11 papers), Personal Information Management and User Behavior (10 papers), Usability and User Interface Design (10 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (7 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (6 papers) and ICT in Developing Communities (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (727 citations), Information Systems and Management (193 citations), Applied Psychology (127 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (388 citations) and Computer Science Applications (70 citations). Jon Bird has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Paul Marshall, Anna L. Cox, Yvonne Rogers, Daniel Harrison, Marta E. Cecchinato, Nadia Bianchi‐Berthouze, Janet van der Linden, Erwin Schoonderwaldt, Vaiva Kalnikaitė and Rose Johnson. Their work appears in journals such as Artificial Life, BMJ Paediatrics Open, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, Digital Health and Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact