Jon Bird

2.6k citations
91 papers · 2.0k · h-index 27

Impact in

Papers in

Jon Bird

87 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Jon Bird
Comparison fields: 5 of 138
  • Human-Computer Interaction 826
  • Information Systems and Management 215
  • Applied Psychology 117
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 451
  • Computer Science Applications 83
Replace Youn-kyung Lim with:
Youn-kyung Lim South Korea
Michael Burmester Germany
Berry Eggen Netherlands
Andrés Lucero Finland
James Miller Canada
Barbara S. Chaparro United States
Paweł W. Woźniak Germany
Sri Kurniawan United States
Theo Held Germany
Jason Wiese United States
Jon Bird relative to Youn-kyung Lim South Korea Youn-kyung Lim's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Youn-kyung Lim · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jon Bird

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jon Bird's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jon Bird with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jon Bird more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jon Bird

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jon Bird. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jon Bird. The network helps show where Jon Bird may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jon Bird, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jon Bird Line = papers co-authored together Jon Bird links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 91 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015140
2 2010122
3
Effects of a difference in fundamental frequency in separating two sentences.
1997103
4 201578
5 201665
6 201465
7 201165
8 201565
9 201264
10 201360
11 201958
12 201758
13 201448
14 201746
15 201145
16 201444
17 201544
18 198344
19 201443
20 201540

About Jon Bird

Jon Bird is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Cognitive Neuroscience, Information Systems and Management, Sociology and Political Science and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 91 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (22 papers), Interactive and Immersive Displays (14 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (12 papers), Personal Information Management and User Behavior (10 papers), Usability and User Interface Design (10 papers), Green IT and Sustainability (7 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (6 papers) and Consumer Retail Behavior Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (826 citations), Information Systems and Management (215 citations), Applied Psychology (117 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (451 citations) and Computer Science Applications (83 citations). Jon Bird has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Paul Marshall, Anna L. Cox, Yvonne Rogers, Daniel Harrison, Marta E. Cecchinato, Erwin Schoonderwaldt, Janet van der Linden, Nadia Bianchi‐Berthouze, Vaiva Kalnikaitė and Rose Johnson. Their work appears in journals such as Artificial Life, Ergonomics, Journal of Medical Internet Research, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing and Oxford Art Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact