Os Keyes

34 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Os Keyes's Hit Papers

The Misgendering Machines 2018 · 367 citations
3670+2+5Years since publication100200300

Peers

Os Keyes
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
  • Human-Computer Interaction 455
  • Safety Research 311
  • Computer Science Applications 129
  • Occupational Therapy 76
  • Health Informatics 22
Replace Morgan Klaus Scheuerman with:
Morgan Klaus Scheuerman United States
Asimina Vasalou United Kingdom
Robin N. Brewer United States
Jason C Yip United States
Cosmin Munteanu Canada
Sheena Lewis Erete United States
Benjamin R. Cowan Ireland
Alexis Hiniker United States
Florian Brühlmann Switzerland
Nora McDonald United States
Os Keyes relative to Morgan Klaus Scheuerman United States Morgan Klaus Scheuerman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.0×
Morgan Klaus Scheuerman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Os Keyes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Os Keyes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Os Keyes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Os Keyes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Os Keyes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Os Keyes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Os Keyes. The network helps show where Os Keyes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Os Keyes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Os Keyes Line = papers co-authored together Os Keyes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
The Misgendering Machines
Hit paper breakdown →
2018367
2 2019201
3 2020126
4 201989
5 201881
6 202080
7 202075
8 201972
9 201965
10 201561
11 201955
12 202135
13 201335
14 201532
15 202029
16 202128
17 202126
18 202125
19 202022
20 202013

About Os Keyes

Os Keyes is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Safety Research, Computer Science Applications, Sociology and Political Science and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 35 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (10 papers), Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (7 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (5 papers), Wikis in Education and Collaboration (3 papers), Digital Economy and Work Transformation (2 papers), Privacy, Security, and Data Protection (2 papers), Web Data Mining and Analysis (2 papers) and Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (455 citations), Safety Research (311 citations), Computer Science Applications (129 citations), Occupational Therapy (76 citations) and Health Informatics (22 citations). Os Keyes has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Katta Spiel, Cynthia L. Bennett, Christopher Frauenberger, Geraldine Fitzpatrick, Anna Williams, Margaret Drouhard, Pınar Barlas, Aaron Halfaker, Judith Good and Meredith Durbin. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, Gates Open Research, Seminars in Plastic Surgery and Cultural Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact