Chris Elsden

1.5k citations
55 papers · 1.1k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Chris Elsden

50 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Chris Elsden
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Human-Computer Interaction 663
  • Demography 185
  • Computer Science Applications 75
  • Applied Psychology 61
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 79
Replace Austin L. Toombs with:
Austin L. Toombs United States
Norman Makoto Su United States
Jonas Löwgren Sweden
Vera Khovanskaya United States
Toni Robertson Australia
Lisa P. Nathan Canada
Richmond Y. Wong United States
Xianghua Ding China
Joseph Lindley United Kingdom
Shay David United States
Chris Elsden relative to Austin L. Toombs United States Austin L. Toombs's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Austin L. Toombs · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chris Elsden

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chris Elsden's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chris Elsden with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chris Elsden more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chris Elsden

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chris Elsden. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chris Elsden. The network helps show where Chris Elsden may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chris Elsden, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chris Elsden Line = papers co-authored together Chris Elsden links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017174
2 2015124
3 2020117
4 201878
5 201646
6 201646
7 201640
8 201740
9 201935
10 201529
11 201425
12 201921
13 202121
14 202219
15 201919
16 201719
17 201718
18 202115
19 201814
20 202011

About Chris Elsden

Chris Elsden is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Sociology and Political Science, Information Systems, Demography and Management Information Systems, having authored 55 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (31 papers), Blockchain Technology Applications and Security (11 papers), Technology Use by Older Adults (11 papers), FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance (9 papers), Persona Design and Applications (8 papers), Sharing Economy and Platforms (8 papers), Interactive and Immersive Displays (7 papers) and Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (663 citations), Demography (185 citations), Computer Science Applications (75 citations), Applied Psychology (61 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (79 citations). Chris Elsden has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include David Kirk, Abigail Durrant, John Vines, David Chatting, Chris Speed, Bettina Nissen, Andrew Garbett, Mike Harding, Marie Louise Juul Søndergaard and Britta Schulte. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Big Data & Society, interactions, International Journal of Performance Arts and Digital Media and Human-Computer Interaction.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact