Jonathan Hook

61 papers receiving 974 citations

Peers

Jonathan Hook
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Human-Computer Interaction 558
  • Occupational Therapy 60
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 296
  • Museology 49
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 234
Replace Jean-Bernard Martens with:
Jean-Bernard Martens Netherlands
Miriam Sturdee United Kingdom
Dina Goren‐Bar Israel
Kees Overbeeke Netherlands
Hayes Solos Raffle United States
Stéphanie Buisine France
Ombretta Gaggi Italy
Tony Stockman United Kingdom
Marion Koelle Germany
Daniel Fällman Sweden
Jonathan Hook relative to Jean-Bernard Martens Netherlands Jean-Bernard Martens's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.5×
Jean-Bernard Martens · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Hook

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Hook's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Hook with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Hook more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Hook

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Hook. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Hook. The network helps show where Jonathan Hook may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Hook, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan Hook Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan Hook links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 64 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010102
2 201879
3 201778
4 201477
5
Multi-Touch Surfaces: A Technical Guide
200851
6 202043
7 201042
8 201734
9 201133
10 200932
11 201630
12 201427
13 201527
14 200821
15 201419
16 202019
17 202017
18 201317
19 201217
20 201517

About Jonathan Hook

Jonathan Hook is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Cognitive Neuroscience, Museology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 64 papers that have together received 1000 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (23 papers), Interactive and Immersive Displays (21 papers), Augmented Reality Applications (13 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (10 papers), Digital Games and Media (10 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Games (6 papers), Multimedia Communication and Technology (6 papers) and Video Analysis and Summarization (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (558 citations), Occupational Therapy (60 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (296 citations), Museology (49 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (234 citations). Jonathan Hook has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Patrick L. Olivier, Peter R. Wright, Abigail C. Durrant, Guy Peter Schofield, Pam Briggs, James B. Nicholson, Paul Dunphy, John McCarthy, David W. Kim and John William Nicholson. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery, Convergence The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction and Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact