Jonathan Hook

65 papers receiving 961 citations

Peers

Jonathan Hook
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Human-Computer Interaction 556
  • Occupational Therapy 57
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 298
  • Museology 49
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 230
Replace Jean-Bernard Martens with:
Jean-Bernard Martens Netherlands
Dina Goren‐Bar Israel
Kees Overbeeke Netherlands
Hayes Raffle United States
Miriam Sturdee United Kingdom
Rafael Ballagas United States
Stavroula Ntoa Greece
Marion Koelle Germany
Sandra Baldassarri Spain
Jennifer G. Sheridan United Kingdom
Jonathan Hook relative to Jean-Bernard Martens Netherlands Jean-Bernard Martens's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Jean-Bernard Martens · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Hook

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Hook's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Hook with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Hook more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Hook

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Hook. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Hook. The network helps show where Jonathan Hook may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Hook, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan Hook Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan Hook links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 67 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010101
2 201877
3 201474
4 201771
5
Multi-Touch Surfaces: A Technical Guide
200848
6 201043
7 202042
8 201133
9 201732
10 200931
11 201629
12 201527
13 201427
14 200821
15 201420
16 202018
17 201218
18 201518
19 201317
20 202016

About Jonathan Hook

Jonathan Hook is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 67 papers that have together received 986 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (23 papers), Interactive and Immersive Displays (22 papers), Augmented Reality Applications (14 papers), Digital Games and Media (11 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (11 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Games (7 papers), Multimedia Communication and Technology (6 papers) and Video Analysis and Summarization (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (556 citations), Occupational Therapy (57 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (298 citations), Museology (49 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (230 citations). Jonathan Hook has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Patrick Olivier, Peter Wright, Abigail Durrant, John McCarthy, Paul Dunphy, Guy Schofield, Pam Briggs, John William Nicholson, David W. Kim and James Nicholson. Their work appears in journals such as Convergence The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage and International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact