Medical Terminology

4.0k papers and 45.4k indexed citations i.

About

4.0k papers covering Medical Terminology have received a total of 45.4k indexed citations since 1950. Papers on subfields are most often about the specific topic of Medical Research and Practices, Healthcare Systems and Technology and Health Sciences Research and Education and also cover the fields of General Health Professions, Health Information Management and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management. Papers citing papers on subfields are usually about General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Economics and Econometrics. Some of the most active scholars covering Medical Terminology are Deborah H. Charbonneau, Alan Paton, Niteesh K. Choudhry, Alex Jadad, Anna R. Gagliardi, Tom Delbanco, Lisa Bero, Jadwiga A. Wedzicha, Simon Gilbody and H. Oliphant Nicholson.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers citing papers about Medical Terminology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers covering Medical Terminology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers covering Medical Terminology.

Countries where authors publish papers about Medical Terminology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research in Medical Terminology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers about Medical Terminology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Medical Terminology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore fields with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025