Chemical Health and Safety

14.3k papers and 192.0k indexed citations i.

About

14.3k papers covering Chemical Health and Safety have received a total of 192.0k indexed citations since 1950. Papers on subfields are most often about the specific topic of Chemical Safety and Risk Management, Risk and Safety Analysis and Occupational Health and Safety Research and also cover the fields of Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology and Cancer Research. Papers citing papers on subfields are usually about Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Cancer Research and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology. Some of the most active scholars covering Chemical Health and Safety are Ian C. T. Nisbet, Peter K. LaGoy, Yves Alarie, Stephen M. Rappaport, Ben Armstrong, Faisal Khan, Kevin E. Driscoll, Joseph F. Louvar, Errol Zeiger and Daniel A. Crowl.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers citing papers about Chemical Health and Safety

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers covering Chemical Health and Safety. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers covering Chemical Health and Safety.

Countries where authors publish papers about Chemical Health and Safety

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research in Chemical Health and Safety. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers about Chemical Health and Safety with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chemical Health and Safety more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore fields with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025