General Energy

19.0k papers and 199.5k indexed citations i.

About

19.0k papers covering General Energy have received a total of 199.5k indexed citations since 1950. Papers on subfields are most often about the specific topic of Global Energy Security and Policy, Global Energy and Sustainability Research and Natural Resources and Economic Development and also cover the fields of Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Economics and Econometrics and Political Science and International Relations. Papers citing papers on subfields are usually about Economics and Econometrics, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. Some of the most active scholars covering General Energy are Benjamin K. Sovacool, Vlado Vivoda, Juan C. Reboredo, Andreas Goldthau, Steven Stoft, Indra Øverland, Daniel Yergin, Perry Sadorsky, Thijs Van de Graaf and Qiang Ji.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers citing papers about General Energy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers covering General Energy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers covering General Energy.

Countries where authors publish papers about General Energy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research in General Energy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers about General Energy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites General Energy more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore fields with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025