General Engineering

25.3k papers and 148.8k indexed citations i.

About

25.3k papers covering General Engineering have received a total of 148.8k indexed citations since 1950. Papers on subfields are most often about the specific topic of Civil and Geotechnical Engineering Research, Geomechanics and Mining Engineering and Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures and also cover the fields of Civil and Structural Engineering, Mechanics of Materials and Mechanical Engineering. Papers citing papers on subfields are usually about Civil and Structural Engineering, Mechanical Engineering and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality. Some of the most active scholars covering General Engineering are Wanming Zhai, David Thompson, G. G. Meyerhof, Geert Degrande, Lutz Auersch, Xiaozhen Sheng, Georges Kouroussis, Jens C. O. Nielsen, C.J.C. Jones and Sakdirat Kaewunruen.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers citing papers about General Engineering

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers covering General Engineering. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers covering General Engineering.

Countries where authors publish papers about General Engineering

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research in General Engineering. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers about General Engineering with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites General Engineering more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore fields with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025