Health Information Management

154.2k papers and 2.0M indexed citations i.

About

154.2k papers covering Health Information Management have received a total of 2.0M indexed citations since 1950. Papers on subfields are most often about the specific topic of Electronic Health Records Systems, Healthcare Quality and Management and Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and also cover the fields of General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Artificial Intelligence. Papers citing papers on subfields are usually about General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Artificial Intelligence. Some of the most active scholars covering Health Information Management are J Martin Bland, DouglasG. Altman, Tom Fawcett, Barbara J. McNeil, J A Hanley, Richard A. Deyo, Mark H. Davis, David W. Bates, Avedis Donabedian and Andrew P. Bradley.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers citing papers about Health Information Management

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers covering Health Information Management. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers covering Health Information Management.

Countries where authors publish papers about Health Information Management

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research in Health Information Management. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers about Health Information Management with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Health Information Management more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore fields with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025