Reading Psychology

15.5k citations
998 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Reading and Literacy Development
    • Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
    • Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Education top 5%
    • Child Development and Digital Technology
    • Writing and Handwriting Education
    • Parental Involvement in Education

Papers in

    • Reading and Literacy Development 642
    • Educational Strategies and Epistemologies 206
    • Second Language Acquisition and Learning 80
    • Child Development and Digital Technology 126
    • Writing and Handwriting Education 120
    • Parental Involvement in Education 90
    • Education and Critical Thinking Development 78

Reading Psychology

884 papers receiving 12.8k citations

Peers

Reading Psychology
Comparison fields: 5 of 139
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 10.4k
  • Education 8.6k
  • Statistics and Probability 1.7k
  • Language and Linguistics 1.4k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.5k
Replace Reading & Writing Quarterly with:
Reading & Writing Quarterly United States
Journal of Research in Reading United Kingdom
Educational Measurement Issues and Practice United States
Applied Measurement in Education United States
Educational Research Review United States
Intervention in School and Clinic United States
Journal of Education United States
Journal of Research in Childhood Education United States
Mind Culture and Activity United States
American Journal of Education United States
Reading Psychology relative to Reading & Writing Quarterly United States Reading & Writing Quarterly's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Reading & Writing Quarterly · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Reading Psychology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Reading Psychology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Reading Psychology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Reading Psychology more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Reading Psychology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Reading Psychology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Reading Psychology.

About Reading Psychology

The 998 papers published in Reading Psychology in the last decades have received a total of 15.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Reading Psychology usually cover Developmental and Educational Psychology (773 papers), Education (539 papers), Statistics and Probability (140 papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (114 papers) and Library and Information Sciences (13 papers) specifically the topics of Reading and Literacy Development (642 papers), Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (206 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (140 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (126 papers), Writing and Handwriting Education (120 papers), Parental Involvement in Education (90 papers), Second Language Acquisition and Learning (80 papers) and Education and Critical Thinking Development (78 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Reading Psychology are R. Malatesha Joshi, Joanne F. Carlisle, Andrew Biemiller, Roman Taraban, Timothy V. Rasinski, Linda Baker, Laura M. Justice, Oddny Judith Solheim, Cynthia B. Leung and Danielle S. McNamara.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact