Reading Psychology

15.2k citations
991 papers · · active since 1979

Impact in

    • Reading and Literacy Development
    • Second Language Acquisition and Learning
    • Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
    • Language Development and Disorders
  • Education top 5%
    • Literacy and Educational Practices
    • Early Childhood Education and Development

Papers in

    • Reading and Literacy Development 754
    • Educational Strategies and Epistemologies 52
    • Second Language Acquisition and Learning 48
    • Literacy and Educational Practices 134
    • Teacher Education and Leadership Studies 36

Reading Psychology

902 papers receiving 13k citations

Peers

Reading Psychology
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 9.9k
  • Education 4.7k
  • Language and Linguistics 1.6k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.2k
  • Literature and Literary Theory 778
Replace Reading & Writing Quarterly with:
Reading & Writing Quarterly United States
Journal of Research in Reading United Kingdom
Journal of Research in Childhood Education United States
Journal of Education United States
Journal for the Study of Education and Development Infancia y Aprendizaje Spain
Scientific Studies of Reading United States
Cambridge Journal of Education United Kingdom
Learning Culture and Social Interaction United States
New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development United States
The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher China
Reading Psychology relative to Reading & Writing Quarterly United States Reading & Writing Quarterly's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Reading & Writing Quarterly · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Reading Psychology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Reading Psychology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Reading Psychology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Reading Psychology more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Reading Psychology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Reading Psychology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Reading Psychology.

About Reading Psychology

The 991 papers published in Reading Psychology in the last decades have received a total of 15.2k indexed citations . Papers published in Reading Psychology usually cover Developmental and Educational Psychology (814 papers), Education (263 papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (96 papers), Language and Linguistics (51 papers) and Literature and Literary Theory (46 papers) specifically the topics of Reading and Literacy Development (754 papers), Literacy and Educational Practices (134 papers), Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (52 papers), Second Language Acquisition and Learning (48 papers), EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (46 papers), Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (44 papers), Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (38 papers) and Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (36 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Reading Psychology are R. Malatesha Joshi, Joanne F. Carlisle, Andrew J. Biemiller, Roman Taraban, Linda Baker, Laura Marie Justice, Oddny Judith Solheim, Timothy Victor Rasinski, Rachel M. Best and Randy Granville Floyd.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact